Search results

The Court will not reconsider. This specific point is a point of legal contention where the interpretations of both parties differ, and these differences lead to different results in practice. It would be irresponsible to toss out one of the two legal theories presented to the Court before...

Overruled. The specificity of the question asked warranted the specificity of the answer.

Plaintiff, you have 72 hours to submit your Opening Statements.

Consider the listed logs in my Order as verified by Staff.

Let it be known that I'll be the one to handle this Appeal. This message does not convey an acceptance of this Appeal, nor a review of its merits.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF SUMMONS @KenjixYT07, @Escudos and @SpaceExplorer865 are commanded to appear as witnesses before the Federal Court in the case of lemmou & .Hyrophant12 v. Cpvp_dog [2026] FCR 71.

Case dismissed for want of prosecution.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUBPOENA Federal Judge Superwoops, in the jurisdiction of the Federal Court, orders the Staff Team to produce the following records in accordance with this order filed in the case of StarKlower v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 73...

Objection overruled. That being said, Plaintiff's counsel is warned that future instances of this happening will not be tolerated.

Very doable. I will open a sidebar.

The Court would deliver its ruling during the in-game appeal as well.

Objection sustained. It will be struck.

Due to the nature of this non-party Contempt appeal, the Federal Court will not issue summons. Rather, we will move into the Appellant's brief. The Court is very interested in hearing this as an oral argument/brief; if anything, for immersion and fun, and to get newer legal minds excited about...

Upon careful review of the filings submitted by the Appellant through counsel, the Federal Court accepts review of this Appeal. The Court will issue summons shortly.

This civil action is dismissed for want of prosecution. Defendant, please notify the Court if you still seek your counterclaim within 72 hours.

Plaintiff, is it possible your requested messages are from June 3rd, not June 5th? Staff was not able to verify any logs for June 5th.

Good morning your honour and sorry about the delays. We have reached a settlement agreement with the Defense.

Logs are under Staff review.

The Court denies Point 1 for constituting legal controversy that shall be resolved upon the conclusion of the trial, and hesitantly denies Point 2, as the Court still wishes to examine witness testimony. Witness summons shall now be issued. So ordered, Judge Superwoops

That is permissible, deadlines tolled for 48 hours.