Search results

  1. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Bloatmaxxer v. Department of Commerce [2026] DCR 40

    @Superwoops is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Bloatmaxxer v Department of Commerce [2026] DCR 40
  2. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Adjourned fickogames v. Ollie_MineCraft [2026] DCR 22

    I'll be presiding over this case from here on out.
  3. aubunny

    Lawsuit: In Session Wayne_Kerr12 v. Beloitte [2026] DCR 38

    I'll be presiding over this case from here on out.
  4. aubunny

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    Sustained Question shall be struck- plaintiff is free to submit questions regarding the same topic, but narrowed to non-privileged information. Because the DoJ is, by default, the attorney for government entities, communication among these entities is privileged. Questions shall be struck...
  5. aubunny

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    Granted - In Part This trial has gone on for many months, with multiple delays from both parties. With a key witness potentially unavailable for a whole month, further undermining the Plaintiff's ability to be, theoretically, made whole for their alleged harm. The Court sees multiple key issues...
  6. aubunny

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    Given the time constraints for our witnesses, I will allow the Plaintiff (@Franciscus), who has summoned all witnesses, to begin questioning those available immediately. The Plaintiff shall have 24 hours to present their questions to the available witnesses, pinging the witness [or witnesses]...
  7. aubunny

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    @DonTrillions @coshjlose @FloorIsTired @xSyncx @Kaiserin_ @ElysiaCrynn @EATB @EmmDubz is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Multiman155 v Federal Reserve Bank
  8. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UnknownWithAB v. loxuk_ [2026] DCR 36

    I assume you mean Nolle Prosequi, which I will grant. This case is dismissed without prejudice. As a note to both parties, please take the time to familiarize yourself with court procedures. In re [2026] FCR 8 | [2026] SCR 8 establishes "Litigants must respect decorum in the court. Proper...
  9. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UnknownWithAB v. loxuk_ [2026] DCR 36

    Discovery is now over. Plaintiff shall now have 72 hours to present their opening statement.
  10. aubunny

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    Granted, good luck with finals.
  11. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UnknownWithAB v. loxuk_ [2026] DCR 36

    You are free to do so. As a further note, you do not need permission to amend your complaint during discovery. You just need to declare what you changed and that you are doing so (Rule 3.3 of Court Rules and Procedures)
  12. aubunny

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    Thank you. Now, the Defendant shall have 72 hours to do the same.
  13. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UnknownWithAB v. loxuk_ [2026] DCR 36

    In accordance with Rule 3.3 of Court Rules and Procedures, you need to declare what amendments are being made, and then you're free to do so.
  14. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UnknownWithAB v. loxuk_ [2026] DCR 36

    Discovery shall be open beginning now and continuing for 5 days from the posting of this message [May 2nd, 5:09 PM CST]. cc @DaanBanaan5673 @BennyBoi2187
  15. aubunny

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    Alright, with all this set straight, we can untoll our deadlines and move forward. The Prosecution (@Franciscus) shall have 72 hours to present its opening statement.
  16. aubunny

    Lawsuit: In Session Multiman155 v. Federal Reserve Bank [2026] DCR 29

    Overruled It is true that, under an emergency injunction, the preservation of the information, with full timestamps and associated metadata, was ordered. The presentation of said information is bound to require only what is relevant to the case matter at hand. The Court finds that within the...
  17. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ThePufferOffical V. brett_miller [2026] DCR 35

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict - ThePufferOffical V. brett_miller [2026] DCR 35 The Prosecution alleges that Defendant "brett_miller" is liable for the civil prosecution for the following crimes: Threats, Disturbing the Peace, and Trespassing. They derive that...
  18. aubunny

    Lawsuit: Dismissed UnknownWithAB v. loxuk_ [2026] DCR 36

    @loxuk is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Unknownwithab V Loxuk_ [2026] DCR 36.
Back
Top