Search results

1. On what authority are you able to determine what qualifies as a "reliable market rate"? 2. How have you come to this conclusion? Have you looked at every single transaction between every single entity?

Your honor, we were never given time for cross examination.

BREACH OF PROCEDURE Questions were about 4 hours late.

Your honor, due to IRL circumstances I ask for a 72 hour extension.

Your honor, I have assigned @asexualdinosaur as the Public Defender for this case.

The Defense has no further questions for Staff.

We would ask that @End (through the Staff Team) testify answer this question: Did you hard-delete a DoC filing regarding Royal Dragon & Shell?

Follow-up: 3. Is it possible for a Senior Staff Member or Owner to delete a post without leaving a trace of it behind?

For the staff team: 1. Was there ever a filing in the DoC registering Royal Dragon & Shell (or similar name [e.g. Royal Dragon and Shell; RDS; Royal Dragon & Shell Corporation; RDS LLC; etc.]) as a legal entity? 2. If yes, why is it no longer available?

Your honor, seeing as no follow-up questions have been asked, may I cross-examine the witnesses?

Your honor, Discovery is already over,  and the News Article is itself one entire piece of evidence. This objection should be overruled.

Your honor, I found a few more references to old labels, however, I believe this is all.

Your honor, there are still numerous references to the original names of the exhibits, far too many to list. For example, there are still 125 references to "P-001" (including quotes).

BREACH OF PROCEDURE "Notice of clarification on witness direct examination" is not a valid motion. Furthermore, it is unclear to me how "FAS" is equal to "SAGARANA Bookstore."

Your honor, I apologize for the delay, as you know I was at a wedding this weekend IRL, and the Public Defender I assigned to appear has failed their duty. If you would allow it, I can reassign this case.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT WHY THE DEFENDANT IS NOT LIABLE TO THE PLAINTIFF EVEN IF THE CONTRACT IS VALID Ultimately, this case comes down to the fact that the Defendant provided the Plaintiff with four revisions of both documents for a total of eight...

PERJURY Given the extreme evidence showing that Pepecuu's case is fake (see motion to amend Answer to Complaint #2), we ask the court charge them with perjury. MOTION TO DISMISS The Defense respectfully alleges that Co-Plaintiff Pepecuu has mislead the court, fabricated evidence, and...

MOTION TO AMEND The Defense seeks to amend ANSWER TO COMPLAINT #2 (Pepecuu's compaint) to become the following: I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. DENY 3/3/2026 MasterCaelen (“Borrower”) and Pepecuu (“Lender”) entered into the Mortgage Agreement P-P001, P-P003. 2. NEITHER AFFIRM NOR DENY 3/3/2026...

The Defense wishes to call @ToadKing as a witness.

AMBIGUOUS It is not clear what "the FAS plot" is or what "that role" is. ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE / AMBIGUOUS There is no evidence the Plaintiff was in her assigned room at "the FAS plot" and it is not clear what "the FAS plot" is. RELEVANCE / AMBIGUOUS Whether or not an area is...