Search results

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - IMPROPER EVIDENCE Your Honour, In SCR 20 [2025], the SCR ruled Following this precedent, in DCR 5 [2026], the Defense requested evidence that was not independently corroborated to be struck, and the DCR granted this action...

@dearev Your Honour, PD is present, please give me 72 hours to present an answer.

In the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont To whichever honourable magistrate it may concern, Your Honour(s), It is impossible to continue with the remaining period of discovery without a presiding officer present. Any proceedings of discovery would go against the spirit of court...

Your Honour, Defense requests a sidebar

@dearev Your Honour, may we be heard on sentencing?

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PLEA The Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. Nie_lot Defendant I. ENTRY OF PLEA 1. GUILTY on the charge of Obstruction of Justice By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am...

RESPONSE TO THE OBJECTION Your Honour, we aren't asking to respond to how the Appellant interprets the law, but how the Appellant filed a brief where some parts of it were misinterpreted by them and are possibly misleading the court. We do not want to file another brief, but we retract our...

Your Honour, there are blatant misinterpretations about our brief that may mislead the court, may we respond to those parts in specific to help clarify?

Your Honour, the Plaintiff requests an extension of discovery by 96 hours. This means we would be starting trial on Monday.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO APPELANT’S BRIEF (APPELLEE’S BRIEF) The Appellee respectfully submits that the judgment of the DCR remain affirmed and that this appeal be rejected. I. AFFIRMATION OF KEY DATES The Appellee affirms the above Key Dates would also...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER The Plaintiff respectfully requests reconsideration of the Court’s decision striking Facts 1 and 2. P-020 and P-022 establish that the Palantir company account maintained control over the Palantir News server. D-003...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO STRIKE The Appellee respectfully requests that the following part of the Appellant's Brief be struck. The matter relied upon above remains pending before the Federal Court, and a final verdict has not yet been delivered. As such...

Your Honour, PD is present. Defense requests a 72 hour extension in order to make itself familiar with the charges and contact the Defendant. (I request that the court note I do have exams going on now which is why I am requesting a 72 hour extension instead of 48) PDD ( @Superwoops ) will be...

Your Honour, I've failed to provide Proof of Representation. Please find it attached below: Apologies for disturbing the court while it is in recess.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Matthew100x Plaintiff v. AbsInf Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. Matthew100x (represented by TheSnowGuardian) 2. AbsInf II...

Your Honour, Error on the Appellee's counsel. This part can be disregarded; we are amending our request to an extension of 48 hours for submitting Appellee's brief, as we did just get the case recently (keeping in mind the Court's generous 24 hours extension that was granted already), and since...

Your Honour, Talion & Partners LLC will be representing the Appellee. On behalf of Talion & Partners LLC, I (First Chair) and @Capt11543 (Second Chair) will be representing the Appellee. As far as I am aware, the Appellee does not have to respond to the above Brief at this stage of the...

Your Honour, we do have a response ready for this Motion to Dismiss, provided your Honour grants our Motion to Amend.

Your Honour, the Plaintiff requests a sidebar for procedural questions (we can continue in the previous one I believe)

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 12700k Counterplaintiff (Cplauntiff) v. Maxib02 Counterdefendant (CDefendant) I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. AFFIRM. 2. AFFIRM. 3. AFFIRM. 4. AFFIRM. 5. AFFIRM that P-002 was an inaccessible link. NEITHER AFFIRM NOR DENY that...