Search results

Your Honour @Franciscus , We ask that our deadline for answer to complaint be tolled until the above objection is ruled on.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - IMPROPER EVIDENCE, RELEVANCE Your Honour, the Plaintiff submitted the Complaint with P-001 as an exhibit, (see below). The exhibit contains texts logs of apparent transactions. However, in [2025] SCR 20 the Hnble. Supreme Court...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honour, the Defence cannot respond to the statement made by Plaintiff if it isn't formally an item recognized by the Court. If the Plaintiff believes that procedure has been breached, the Court should...

Your Honour, I did not see this. Talion & Partners INC. will retract if the Court allows the Defendant to represent pro-se.

Your Honour, Talion & Partners INC. has an existing retainer agreement which covers this suit. The binding legal agreement covers civil representation until 22 May 2026. If the Court finds such proof enough of a proof of consent to represent we will be obliged under the agreement to take...

INTERROGATORIES TO THE DEFENDANT 1. Did you delete messages which caused this controvery (P-001) after the Plaintiff's Counsel, i.e., I, informed the SDP about your actions in a ticket in it's Discord server? (Yes/No) 2. Why did you send the message (P-001) containing the Plaintiff's...

Your Honour, the Plaintiff requests an extension of Discovery by 3 days (72 hours).

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION NO. 1 - BREACH OF PROCEDURE (FILED ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF) Your Honour, according to 'Creating a Lawsuit in the Federal Court' thread a lawyer The opposing counsel for the Defendant (Plura72) said The Defence cannot speak on...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL (ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF) The Plaintiff believes that the Defendant has deleted messages that replied to JuliaMC_ and messages that were sent in regards to this whole controversy. (See P-001 and P-003) TheSnowGuardian, on...

Your Honour, the Plaintiff resubmits this (modified) motion: IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL (ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF) The Plaintiff believes that the Defendant has deleted messages that replied to JuliaMC_ and messages that were sent in regards to...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO AMEND The Prosecution would like to add the following exhibit:

Your Honour, we (the Plaintiff) ask that the Defendants' answer to complaint be tolled until the Motion to Reconsider (#25) is ruled on.

Yes Your Honour.

The Plaintiff humbly requests the Court to rule on the Counterclaim after witness testimony is heard on the orginal claim, should said witness testimony even happen.

Your Honour, we have a procedural question: When would the Counterclaim be ruled on?

Your Honour, I have a procedural question: Is this extension granted to the Defence aswell? As they seem to have not submitted a response to Motion to Reconsider.

Understood, Your Honour.

Your Honour, can this please be the last extension they get..

Your Honour, Apologies for our confusion, to begin with: 1. We retract our Motion to Reconsider and Brief. 2. Additionally, we would like an extension of 48 hours on witness questions. We're trying to get in touch with the Defendant for an out-of-court settlement and we would much rather...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS The Defendant’s interpretation that one can only seek damages should be quantifiable is a dangerous one. The PALANTIR Act amended the Privacy Act to include section 6(h) on 28 December 2025. The RCCA was signed...