Search results

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS GRANTED. This case is STAYED until Plaintiff's new counsel enters an appearance or until 1 December 2025 at 02:00 UTC, whichever occurs first. The stay will lift automatically when either condition is met. Upon the...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Court, based on the submissions by the Commonwealth, considers it extremely unlikely that Plaintiff does not directly or indirectly operate, manage or control Anchor Watch. At the very least, Plaintiff had some...

I'll take that as a no. Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, this matter is DISMISSED without prejudice.

These comments are stricken as they were made out of turn. However, now that you are here, do you wish to be heard on the Court's findings or the Plaintiff's Motion to Nolle Prosequi?

The Commonwealth has 48 hours to respond to Plaintiff's Response to the Order to Show Cause and to make any Objections it wishes against the Plaintiff's Discovery Requests. @juniperfig

Thank you. Do you wish to amend your previous counsel's Discovery Requests or his Response to the Order to Show Cause?

@asexualdinosaur is required to appear before the District Court in the case of AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

The Court, having requested Order 2 of the above Court Order be actioned by the Staff Team, enters the following documents received into the record. Accordingly, the Court identifies the Owner/Operator of "Anchor Watch" to be @asexualdinosaur. Magistrate Venne.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO PRODUCE OWNERSHIP RECORDS Before the Court is a Motion to Compel filed by the Plaintiff in this case requesting an order to compel the disclosure of the identity of the owner, operator, and/or author of the news organisation known as...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Court has conducted sua sponte review of Plaintiff's discovery requests and finds that several of the demands appear facially overbroad and disproportionate in the light of the instant litigation. The Court intends to...

We will now enter Discovery, which shall last 5 days. Discovery may be ended early if both Parties agree. @ToadKing @juniperfig

SUSTAINED. Please note that the Commonwealth only requested that the bolded sections be struck. Those sections have been demonstrated to be false, given Plaintiff was given the opportunity to respond to allegations regarding their involvement in Anchor Watch News. Furthermore, an objection for...

OVERRULED. Given that this additional Contempt Charge occurred in Plaintiff's private practice, I am inclined to give the Plaintiff some creative liberty in his argument here. The Commonwealth has included evidence of this Contempt Charge in Plaintiff's private practice in their Answer, so I can...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PARTIAL DISMISSAL Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by the Commonwealth on 26 November 2025. Upon review of the pleadings and record, consideration of the applicable law, and being fully advised, the Court issues the following...

Thank you! You have 48 hours to present an Answer to Complaint.

@Attorney General (@Kaiserin_) is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Asexualdinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95 In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honour, Defendant's counsel responded to both of my objections without the leave of this Honourable Court, thereby speaking out of turn. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that these responses be...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY Your Honour, This statement is false. The Verdict in FCR 78 does not state anything of the sorts. That Verdict determines that a Contract was not formed because the bid was ambiguous, which is not at all the same as what...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY Your Honour, This statement is clearly perjurious. As clearly shown in P-003, Defendant at the very least held R$40,000 in his Volt Bank account at the time. Additionally, as shown in Plaintiff's Motion for Emergency...