I approach as Clerk, the Federal Court has vacated this order in its entirety.
https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/appeal-in-re-mmiqa-ex-parte-communication-2026-fcr-81.43696/post-175023
Any stay on this case is lifted.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Decision, Memorandum, and Order: Appeal in re: MMiqa, Ex Parte Communication [2026] FCR 81
SUMMARY ON APPEAL
The District Court convicted the Appellant of Ex Parte Communication under Part III, Section 16 of the Criminal Code Act ("CCA"). The...
Justice Mug writes the opinion of the Court.
This appeal arises from the Federal Court's verdict in Dartanboy v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 65. In the underlying case, Appellant (a Judge at the time of the inciting incident) sought to have vacated a House motion stating that he was...
Apologies Attorney General,
I thought I had submitted my Order of Dismissal.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Order of Dismissal
On September 7, 2026, the Court ordered the Plaintiff to submit an Opening Statement within 48 hours, and on September 10, 2026, the Court...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Order to Show Cause
Plaintiff's sole claim rests on a provision requiring the full return of a $50,000 investment should Marksman LLC cease operations, while the Plaintiff simultaneously retains a 33.5% ownership interest in that enterprise...
I'm your Judge.
1) StrawberrySara appears to be a staff member in your Complaint. Individual staff member shall not be summoned in the course of their duties. This witness is struck from the Complaint.
What does P-002 show me? I don't see a staff member's response here.
I'll prepare a dismissal order to this effect.
@RiggoSoft You have 48 Hours to show good cause as to why this case should not be dismissed with prejudice.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.