Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RavenReap v. BrutalByteMC [2026] DCR 179

    We proceed in inquest. Inquest expiration date shall be the minimum prescribed by the Rules. @amah853 Inquest Discovery is open until 10/5/26 at 9pm EDT. Please inform the Court how you wish to prove your case. You may offer more evidence, witnesses and legal briefs including your arguments...
  2. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Two Guys Realty v AWSJonny [2026] DCR 112

    Granted, 10/4/26 at 9pm EDT.
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MMiqa v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 77

    No idea, but the CW’s motion is dispositive in nature, so I don’t really need to hear from them again if the motion is granted. Same applies to your motion for summary.
  4. M

    Appeal: Pending In re [2026] FCR 21 | [2026] SCR 19

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order - Appellant's Motion for Reconsideration Appellant moves this Court to consider its previous denial of Appellant's summary conviction of Contempt of Court. Following submission, the Court discussed and now issues the following order...
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Pending IgnitedTNT v. SingeHeart, Addams and Associates

    Also, where is your proof of authorization that you're representing Ignited? You can't just randomly appear in a docket.
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Pending IgnitedTNT v. SingeHeart, Addams and Associates

    Submit a motion to reconsider, the evidence you've submitted isn't immediately changing my mind here. Furthermore, the Court will review the Corporate Docket to see which natural persons may be called to represent the company.
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RavenReap v. BrutalByteMC [2026] DCR 179

    @Brutalbytemc is commanded to appear in the District Court in the case of Ravenreap v. Brutalbytemc [2026] DCR 179
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed maks2023 v. SwiftSounds [2026]

    Action dismissed for want of prosecution without prejudice.
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Pending IgnitedTNT v. SingeHeart, Addams and Associates

    DENIED. The issuance of such an injunction would be futile. Further, I see no securitization that would otherwise require seizure of assets.
  10. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Two Guys Realty v AWSJonny [2026] DCR 112

    @ameslap You have until 10/2/26 at 9pm EDT to offer a response
  11. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Patato v. Department of the Interior

    Administratively dismissed, please read the court rules and format this properly.
  12. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned TheStockExchange LLC vs. President antonfr [2026] FCR 91

    I've amended the caption as ordered.
  13. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned TheStockExchange LLC vs. President antonfr [2026] FCR 91

    Your Honour, The Constitution vests in the President the responsibility for the "execution and enforcement of the law." Having President Fontaine (in this case antonfr, the current President) be a co-defendant is exactly what the Constitution itself requires. Further, the corporate entity...
  14. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed amah853 v. Department of Homeland Security [2026] DCR 178

    Very nice, action dismissed with prejudice.
  15. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned TheStockExchange LLC vs. President antonfr [2026] FCR 91

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION TheStockExchange LLC TSEInvestmentBank LLC Plaintiffs v. President Antonfr_ Fontaine, in his official capacity Commonwealth of Redmont Defendants COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN...
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned TheStockExchange LLC vs. President antonfr [2026] FCR 91

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT EMERGENCY INJUNCTION Plaintiff respectfully prays for the following: 1. An interim injunction, for the duration of this case, prohibiting the Department of Commerce from collecting any fee under Section 16(12) from the Plaintiff, and from...
  17. M

    Appeal: Pending in re [2026] DCR 69 | [2026] FCR 76

    Okay, let me review and go from there.
  18. M

    Appeal: Pending in re [2026] DCR 69 | [2026] FCR 76

    I'm honestly lost what you're appealing here. Can you take 72 Hours to concisely state what's wrong. I see a few questions directed at the Federal Court here...
  19. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Meadowbrooke Bank V JJDizz1L [2026] DCR 130

    Plaintiff's Motion to Strike is GRANTED as to d-002 and DENIED as to d-001. Defendant concedes that d-002 was obtained through private contact with Plaintiff's employee while Plaintiff was represented and outside formal discovery. The Court agrees it should be excluded, as such contact is not a...
  20. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Two Guys Realty v AWSJonny [2026] DCR 112

    48 hours granted. The Court is being immensely patient considering Plaintiff's patience since this action was filed in June.
Back
Top