Search results

@Plura72 is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Culls v. Plura72 [2025] FCR 94

Granted. The Defendant cannot sell or transfer the properties until this case is over.

Denied. This court will give some grace that it was an honest mistake.

Granted.End is charged with 1 count of perjury and will pay a fine of $5,000.

@MysticPhunky, you were asked to provide the documents described by the quote. You have 12 hours to submit to the court or be found in contempt. @lawanoesepr, you were asked to appear in the Judiciary Discord to provide the documents described by the quote (something you requested). You have 12...

Objection overruled - in part. First, I generally will allow amicus briefs that bring substantial viewpoints or analysis on legal issues that the parties of the case either 1) don't have a perspective on or 2) bring to light new information/review. On the Precedent by the defense, I agree with...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Dodrio3 v. PurpleBG - [2025] FCR 77 Civil Action I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION The Defendant made a legal contract when they bid on the plots. The Defendant is not protected by force majeure as force majeure expires when the crisis ends...

That’s cool, please submit the required information.

For now, I will grant an additional 24 hours, for a total of 96 hours. If you need any additional time, please request it as it gets closer to the deadline.

@aubunny, please clarify what you wish to have. We will extend the discovery until 12:01 AM on September 16 (Mountain Standard Time, my court my timezone). That should give us enough time to finish all discovery. Will do the subpoenas in a moment. Sad day. Granted on the following: Channels...

Noted. As there are no questions, the Plaintiff has 72 hours to submit their closing statements. In the interest of time, once 72 hours are up or the Plaintiff's Closing statements are posted, the Defense shall have 72 hours starting from that moment.

Seeing as there have been no other questions, the witnesses now go to the Defense for questioning. As a reminder the process is a 24 ask period followed by a 24 hour answer period, and that cycle repeats until there are no further questions.

If I have missed anything, please let me know. With all the new motions it is easy to accidentally skip one.

Granted. The Commonwealth has 72 hours to produce the information requested. Go ahead.

Motion to Reconsider Denied. The SCR ruling does not leave a binding precedent on this case. The case cited, [2025] SCR 14, explores a potential mishandling of the Executive Standards Act and does not involve any constitutional arguments as this one does. The public shall retain the right to...

This is on hold until we get the WPR chats.

Go ahead and amend the complaint if you haven't already. Granted. The WPR is compelled to submit the messages as described by the subpoena within the next 72 hours.

Denied on the basis that the Objection Guide only defines Non-responsive remarks to witnesses and not to interrogatories. That being said, the Plaintiff is compelled to answer the second part of the question truthfully and to the best of their ability.

I shall deny these motions. I do not want to get this court sidetracked with every classification law and get away from the core question: Judicial FOI Requests. You can reach out to these individuals for information but I will not be compelling them to provide them. I will grant these motions...

Please explain the purpose to the court. This is broad-reaching and dates back years and I am inclined to deny anything that is rescinded or no longer relevant to the current Classified Materials Act.