Search results

@Kaiserin_ is required to appear before the federal Court in the case of Aboundedcomet Expungement. When you arrive, please post a response of approval or denial for the expungement.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT COURT ORDER - DISMISSAL I shall be dismissing this case with prejudice. Court is now adjourned.

Here is how we are going to do things: 1. Discovery is extended 72 hours from now; 2. In the meantime I will open a ticket in the Judiciary Discord, please make sure you are there so we can figure out when to do the in-game trial. 3. This will also provide you enough time to get your opening...

I am overseeing this case. Objection denied. I believe this is an issue with the Mac photo-link feature and not the fault of Counsel. I will say that this court agrees that the document shown in P-001 and the document that is linked in P-002 are indeed the same. They share a name and URL (I...

I have taken over.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Eddiegonza420 v. Home Investment - [2025] FCR 95 Civil Action I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION The Defendant did not provide the contractually obligated monthly updates on the Plaintiff’s Portfolio. The Defendant also ceased all communication...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Galactic Empire of Redmont v. Department of Construction and Transportation - [2025] FCR 78 Civil Action I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION Plot C279 is protected by Res Judicata after being litigated in 2023. The plots are constitutionally...

As it has been 24 hours, @Imza is found in Contempt for a second time and fined $3,000. We shall be moving to a default judgment. Court is in recess pending the verdict.

Seeing as it has now been over 96 hours and no response, I will be finding @Imza with Contempt of Court. They are charged $1,000 for this first instance. They have 24 hours to comply with the Answer to the Complaint or be charged further and this case will go to a Default Judgement.

I am no longer the presiding officer, but we can both agree that precedent is clear: My recusal shall stand.

Court is in recess pending a verdict.

Both motions are granted. This case is dismissed. No body shall be led in any contempt. Court is now adjourned. Thank you.

Objection Sustained. It is this court's belief that to call a sitting justice, judge, or magistrate to testify in a trial is improper. I allowed the communication from Smallfries because it was from their time prior to sitting on the bench. To ask a sitting judicial officer to testify and make...

I would normally allow for a response by the opposing counsel, but precedent is clear from Chief Justice xEndeavour. In UtCowboy21 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 31, Chief Justice xEndeavour wrote: In line with this, I agree that there is no actual or perceived impartiality because of...

@Milkcrack , @gwiis, and @End shall be held in Contempt of Court. They shall each be fined $5,000. They are still ordered to comply with the Court ordered subpoena within 72 hours or face additional sanctions. Omegabiebel made themselves known to the court and the court missed it. I will not...

My bad for missing this, please join the Judicairy Discord to submit these documents. You have 48 hours to do so. cc: @aubunny @Franciscus please join as well so I can add you to the closed court session.

Here is the deal: 1. I do not find the argument that there was confusion based on frequent updates to a complaint to be reason enough to give grace on updating the answer to the complaint. The court allows complaints and answers to be modified during discovery; it is up to the counselors to keep...

72 hours starting now.

I had to drag out a piece of paper and write things down so I got the timeline correct. Here it is (again, my court, my timezome - MST). Sept. 10 8:23 AM - 72 hours were given for Plaintiff Closing Statements (deadline is Sept. 13, 8:23 AM) 8:39 AM - Plaintiff requests an additional 72 hours...

Since there is a contested fact about judicial prejudice, I shall allow the evidence. Objection overruled. The objection is overruled. Since Juniperfig served as a Federal Judge that expereince provides at least some value concerning the issues raise on Fact 10. That said, I will be limiting...