Search results

It was intended that you would be appellee, the Commonwealth was called in error. Thank you for pointing out this flaw. In addition, in a 2-0 vote the Supreme Court has decided that there will not be an appellee for this issue. Though legally permissible, we believe it better to treat this...

Appellee @Franciscus (or rather, the Government generally @Attorney General's Office) has seventy-two hours to post their appellee brief. Please see this post for more information of what a brief is.

In turn: Due to the lengthy delay in response, the appellant will have until 1:43 PM EST, October 13, 2025, to post their brief. This is sixty-four hours from now, representing the initial seventy-two hours allotted minus the roughly eight hours between the court's response and the...

In a 2-0 vote, the Supreme Court dismisses this case sua sponte for lack of standing under rule 2.1(3). The only standing the Plaintiff alleges before the Supreme Court is through the removal of office of Representative Imza. This is a remedy available in very few circumstances—only through...

In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court has decided to grant this appeal. The Appellant, @gribble19 (attorney @Matthew100x ) has seventy-two hours to post their Appellant Brief.

MOTION TO RECONSIDER - VOLUNTARY RECUSAL OF JUSTICE SMALLFRIES4 I am moved by Appellant's arguments and sympathetic to their concerns. It is highly unfortunate that each of the three individuals who sat on this three-person bench believed they had a duty to recuse from this case, and its...

Present. I have none.

In a 3-0 decision, the Supreme Court dismisses this case sua sponte for lack of standing. The Plainitff lacks standing to argue before this court under Rule 2.1(3). The removal of officials may only be sought in a criminal trial or when it is alleged that the official obtained their office...

At the wish of the Plaintiff, this case is dismissed.

The Commonwealth shall have forty-eight hours to provide its answer to the complaint.

@Attorney General's Office is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of Plura72 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] SCR 15.

Case is dismissed. The Court thanks all involved for their time.

@craftysciguy is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. CraftySciGuy [2025] SCR 13.

By unanimous decision, this court finds the plaintiff lacks standing to sue before the Supreme Court. As with ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 80, the court believes that removal from office is only available as a judicial remedy for the State itself to pursue in cases where the...

The Commonwealth shall have forty-eight hours to present its Answer to the Complaint.

@Attorney General's Office is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of bigpappa140 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] SCR 11.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Even when taking into account the extra 12 hours that the Judge may have granted, the Defendant was still late to relate the testimony he was given almost a full week to produce. Defendant's testimony holds 406...

The evidence the Plaintiff provided does not show what the Defendant says it shows—only that the bond was called and that it should eventually be paid back. That evidence did not show that the Defendant asked the Exchange to pay them back. To say otherwise is a clear misrepresentation of the...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your honor, The arguments of the defense are quite concerning and border on perjury. It is frightening to see this total collapse in legal standards and professionalism as the defense misrepresents, obfuscates, and in some...

We would like to request a 4 hour extension to 12:09AM Central time, tomorrow morning.