Search results

  1. EmmDubz

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52

    Thank you both for your responses. Your honour, we would like to request an indefinite pause to the trial as the Defendant has approached us to settle.
  2. EmmDubz

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52

    Thank you. Here are the revised questions for @Mask3D_WOLF . 1. Based on your experience as League Commissioner during the event, what are the fundamental, basic duties of an event official with respect to the rules they establish for a competition? 2. You've previously testified that the...
  3. EmmDubz

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vendeka Inc. and Pepecuu v. Department of Commerce [2025] FCR 107

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Vendeka Inc. & Pepecuu Plaintiff v. Department of Commerce Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. Vendeka Inc. (Plaintiff) 2. Pepecuu...
  4. EmmDubz

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52

    Rephrased question for @RspDMcd: 1. Please state what your understanding was of the rule regarding a penalty shot that is caught by a leash before it has fully crossed the goal line. Furthermore, given that the witness @Mask3D_WOLF has now assumed the role of co-counsel for the defense, the...
  5. EmmDubz

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52

    1. @RspDMcd - The defendant has affirmed that "if the ball was caught by the leash before entering the net, it would not count as a goal." Can you confirm whether this was the rule you were operating under when advising the defendant of the penalties? 2. @Mask3D_WOLF - As league commissioner at...
  6. EmmDubz

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Reveille Legion v. BabySoga [2025] DCR 52

    Good morning all, Vendeka Inc. will now be representing the Plaintiff for this case.
  7. EmmDubz

    Lawsuit: Adjourned National Exchange of Redmont v. Mustafa Masody [2025] FCR 88

    Thank you your honour for your, and the courts time on this matter. The plaintiff's account to be credit is under the in-game firm account: NER The legal fees are to be credited to the in-game firm account: Vendeka
  8. EmmDubz

    Lawsuit: Adjourned National Exchange of Redmont v. Mustafa Masody [2025] FCR 88

    MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMEMT As the Defendant has failed to reply to the Writ of Summons, we would request that we move to summary judgement.
  9. EmmDubz

    Lawsuit: Adjourned National Exchange of Redmont v. Mustafa Masody [2025] FCR 88

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION National Exchange of Redmont Plaintiff v. Mustafa Masody Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. National Exchange of Redmont (Plaintiff) 2. Mustafa Masody (Defendant) II...
  10. EmmDubz

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vendeka Inc. vs Finsmt [2025] DCR 53

    Please find attached P-004, showing the transfer of the property directly from Mg. to the defendant. Additionally P-005 is a screenshot of Vendeka's internal communications presenting Mg. clearly stating to the defendant that S-015 is property of Vendeka Inc. It's also visible that the...
  11. EmmDubz

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vendeka Inc. vs Finsmt [2025] DCR 53

    Thank you for your response your honour. The following is the link to the auction thread for the plot: Discord - Group Chat That’s All Fun & Games P-002 is a screenshot from the end of the thread including Mg.'s proof of transfer of payment, and then confirmation of the plot itself being...
  12. EmmDubz

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vendeka Inc. vs Finsmt [2025] DCR 53

    MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT As the Defendant has failed to reply to the Writ of Summons, we would request that we move to summary judgement.
  13. EmmDubz

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vendeka Inc. vs Finsmt [2025] DCR 53

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Vendeka Inc. Plaintiff v. Finsmt Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: WRITTEN STATEMENT FROM THE PLAINTIFF I. PARTIES 1. Vendeka (Plaintiff) 2. Finsmt (Defendant) II. FACTS 1. Plot...
Back
Top