Search results

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honor, and may it please the Court, The case before you today, while wearing the veneer of complexity, is in actuality a very straightforward one. The Defendant, AsexualDinosaur, during the time he was a state...

Your Honor, I would like to request a 24 hour extension to this deadline

Your Honor, It is my understanding that the Plaintiff is currently seeking to settle out of court with my client. Therefore, I would like to request a 48 hour extension of this deadline to allow for these negotiations to take place.

Your honor, I am here representing 12700k

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Persuant to rule 5.2, Motions to dismiss citing Rule 5.5 must be submitted before the beginning of witness testimony. Seeing as witness testimony has concluded, this motion is invalid.

The Commonwealth has decided against questioning this witness, Your Honor.

1. I am an investor and depositer with Oakridge Community Bank. 2. Yes. 3. I hold OCB-003 and OCB-004 bonds. 4. I hold 194 bonds with OCB. 5. The principle I invested is $19,400 6. Yes. 7. Yes. 8. I was very worried for the status of my bonds. 9. Yes. 10. Yes. (Struck in accordance with #83)

Thank you. No more questions you honor

A BILL To Amend the Constitution The citizens of Oakridge, through their elected Representatives in the Town-Council and the force of law ordained to that Town-Council by the people through the constitution of Oakridge, do hereby enact the following provisions into the by-laws: 1 - Short Title...

A BILL To Clarify the powers of the Mayor The citizens of Oakridge, through their elected Representatives in the Town-Council and the force of law ordained to that Town-Council by the people through the constitution of Oakridge, do hereby enact the following provisions into the by-laws: 1 -...

Present your honor

AsexualDinosaur is a citizen of the commonwealth of Redmont and, at the time, was an employee of the commonwealth. This line of questioning is attempting to establish that as a citizen and public servant there were many channels available to him should he have had any concerns over DOC policy.

8. If people have concerns about DOC policy, are there routes to report their concerns? 9. What about internally, are there intergovernmental channels where such concerns could be reported? 10. Did AsexualDinosaur use any of those routes to report his concerns about the policy which was later...

4. What is your relationship like with the DOJ as DOC Secretary? 5. Were you surprised by the leak? 6. Was AsexualDinosaur present in the DOC internal DOJ channel as a part of the DOC’s legal counsel? 7. As DOC Secretary, how did the leak affect your trust in the DOJ?

2. In your capacity as DoC Secretary, what is the legal liability of a news organization considering its status as a legal entity? 3. In your capacity as DoC Secretary, what was the significance of the information leaked by anchor watch news?

A BILL To Amend the Chief of Staff Act The citizens of Oakridge, through their elected Representatives in the Town-Council and the force of law ordained to that Town-Council by the people through the constitution of Oakridge, do hereby enact the following provisions into the by-laws: 1 - Short...

The Commonwealth waives its right ususally granted in Mug courtrooms to respond to these objections as it feels there is nothing to be said which it has not already stated, and wishes for the presiding officer to rule on them.

I am trying to establish the witness’s qualifications before I continue with my line of questioning. The second objection is fully founded, and I apologize to the court for improper procedure. Let me restate the questions here, and I ask that the previous question be stricken from the record...

@ElysiaCrynn What positions do you hold in government and as staff?

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. Rule 5.5 (Lack of Claim) The Plaintiff has failed to submit any evidence whatsoever to support that the...