IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure
Your Honor,
Let us address each of these objections in order, as we have done in the past
Badgering: "Occurs when counsel is antagonizing the witness, either by asking questions without allowing answers or by...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure
Your Honor,
It seems that the Plaintiff is jumping the gun here, this trial has not yet moved into witness questioning and yet the Plaintiff is attempting to force testimony from a witness. Both parties...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS - Rule 5.5 | Lack of Claim
Your Honor,
The defense moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed with prejudice, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
As of the closing of discovery, P-002 and P-003 have been...
Your Honor,
I am writing to inform you that @AmityBlamity shall be joining this case as Second Chair, and I have given them consent to assist in representing me in this Case.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CRIMINAL ACTION
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution
v.
Nie_lot
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows:
On January 27th, 2026, DHS Lieutenant Rookieblue14, acting in their...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure
Your Honor,
It seems that the Plaintiff is jumping the gun(Another time) here, this trial has not even moved into discovery and yet the Plaintiff is already attempting to force testimony from a witness. Both...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Your Honor,
I believe the Plaintiff is confused yet again. Hearsay is defined as "Occurs when a witness testifies about statements made by others to prove the truth of those statements" as the Defense is not a witness, we are confused as to...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Maxib02
Plaintiff
v.
NovaKerbal
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. AFFIRM.
2. AFFIRM.
3. DENY. There is credible evidence to suggest that the Plaintiff has in fact attempted to rig an intra-party vote in their favour...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure
Your Honor,
Let us address each of these objections in order
Speculation: "Arises when a witness testifies about something they have not directly observed. Witnesses should only provide testimony about their...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure
Your Honor,
It seems that the Plaintiff is jumping the gun here, this trial has not even moved into discovery and yet the Plaintiff is already attempting to force testimony from a witness. Both parties should...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - Breach of Procedure
Your Honor,
The Plaintiff has filed a nameless objection, and has not specified under which rule or procedure they are actually objecting under. An objection should not be filed simply because the Plaintiffs...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION- Improper Evidence, Perjury
The Plaintiff clearly misrepresents the evidence of P-002 and P-003, claiming reputational harm that never occurred.
The evidence shown in P-002 and P-003 depicts the Plaintiff deliberately conveying a...
The Plaintiff will refrain from answering this interrogatory until the MTD has been ruled on. As any answer will be redundant if the Honorable Dearev dismisses this case.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER
Your Honor,
It is not solely a point of a lack of evidence, the filing provided by the Plaintiff fails to allege any reputational harm, full stop. This is not a sole issue of lack of evidence, the Plaintiff has failed to...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS - Rule 5.5 | Lack of Claim
The defense moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed with prejudice, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
1. As examined in II, Defenses 2. No evidence whatsoever has been...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Maxib02
Plaintiff
v.
NovaKerbal
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. AFFIRM.
2. AFFIRM.
3. DENY. There are multiple sources who have published these allegations, if this case goes to trial the Defense will call...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.