Search results

I believe it is formatted correctly now.

Present Your Honor

:abs: - The idea is not offensive but the text seems quite restrictive (12 month IP protections only for buildings?), and simultaneously doesn't provide for a mechanism to determine when a build is considered "created". Simultaneously, doesn't protect the IP of buildings during their construction.

:nay: - Congress as a colegial body is more able to make more neutral reccomendations which is positive for the current intent of the FRB as an Independent Central bank. Changing this would be agreeable to me, but just changing appointment seems counterproductive.

Despite the impopularity of the act, I will be ayeing. I don't particularly appreciate people running for House as a "back up" in case they lose a senatorial election.

abstain pending amendment

House Vote: 5-2-3 Senate Vote: 4-0-0 CONGRESS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT A BILL TO Impose a Tax on Revenue from Eviction Auctions and Sellbacks The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that...

House Vote: 5-2-3 Senate Vote: 4-0-0 CONGRESS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT A BILL TO Impose a Tax on Revenue from Eviction Auctions and Sellbacks The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected Representatives in the Congress and the force of law ordained to that...

must've been the wind

is that a yellow number?

Summary judgement on both, your honor, my apologies if it wasn't clear

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT The defence moves that the complaint in this case be judged summarily, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. The plaintiff has produced no responses to the countersuit, and since initial acknowledgment...

A BILL To Establish Standing Orders for the 36th House of Representatives The people of the Commonwealth of Redmont, through their elected representatives in the Congress and the force of law, ordained to that Congress by the people through the constitution, do hereby enact the following...

Your honor, I must amend the evidence the Defense has submitted. I have used the Plantiff's numbering in both the above post and the original Answer to Complaint, and for this clerical error I request authorization to fix it.

EVIDENCE D-002: As to the request for of the counterplantiff for an out of court settlement in public for 6700$ D-003: Plantiff/Counterdefendant exaggerates claim (after publicly offering and then backing off on a settlement my client considered and accepted) D-004: Plantiff/Counterdefendant...

Abs - Concurring with Kaiserin's reasoning, but I don't want to nay it directly since it's a commendable effort that makes sense *if* the AFCR marches forwards.

Your honor, you have not requested a response to the counterclaim.

Your Honor, I intend to introduce evidence regarding some of the claims made in the answer to motion.

Response to Motion Regarding point 1 (Failure to State a Claim): • The CounterDefendant’s own contemporaneous statements—“i think i found a new law suit[sic]” and, when questioned, “it is” (a hustle)—were made before the alleged threat was even uttered. These admissions, made in public chat...