Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. AtomicRedstoner [2026] FCR 6

    So granted, try to get a plea in during the same time. Extensions will be otherwise afforded.
  2. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. AtomicRedstoner [2026] FCR 6

    @TheSnowGuardian has been selected. Feel free to respond to the OSC if you'd like. Otherwise, present a plea within 48 Hours.
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. AtomicRedstoner [2026] FCR 6

    Defendant didn't respond, a non-Superwoops PD will be called.
  4. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xdbh v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 10

    DENIED, the Court isn't granting emergency relief from hypothetical harms.
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xdbh v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 10

    You have 48 Hours to present an answer. Any submission of a motion will toll this deadline, just make it if so inclinde. Otherwise Answer by 2/19/26 @ 9pm EST.
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Bank of Reveille v. KingBob99878 [2025] DCR 108

    https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/2025-dcr-108-appeal-2026-fcr-7.34884/post-135700 The Federal Court VACATES the judgment of the District Court in its entirerty.
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Boykisse v. Musclebound [2026] DCR 19

    https://www.democracycraft.net/threads/boykisse-v-musclebound-2026-dcr-19-appeal-2026-fcr-11.35167/ On appeal, the Federal Court affirms this judgment.
  8. M

    Appeal: Denied Boykisse v. Musclebound [2026] DCR 19 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 11

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Verdict - [2026] DCR 19- Appeal | [2026] FCR 11 Boykisse (Appellant) v. Musclebound (Appellee) Appearances: Boykisse (Appellant) No appearance (Appellee) SUMMARY OF APPEAL The matter comes before the Court on appeal from [2026] DCR 19...
  9. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xdbh v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 10

    @Dogeington is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of xdbh v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] FCR 10
  10. M

    TitanOfDestruct v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF REDMONT

    The Federal Court administratively dismisses the action. Plaintiff, "TitanofDestruct" must have counsel to file any complaint before this Court. All cases filed without such authorization will be deleted with no notice.
  11. M

    TitanOfDestruct v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF REDMONT

    The Federal Court requires Plaintiff to secure Counsel in order to file any future cases before the Courts. 1) This is the COMMONWEALTH of Redmont, not the Republic. 2) Ensure Illegal Gambling Practices are Illegal Act isn't a law. It is a draft of a bill not yet in effect. 3) The "Judiciary...
  12. M

    TitanOfDestruct v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF REDMONT

    Cool, what's your minecraft username. TitanofDestruct aint it.
  13. M

    TitanOfDestruct v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF REDMONT

    You say in a while, the server says not at all. Do you have an old account?
  14. M

    TitanOfDestruct v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF REDMONT

    So again, are you a player on DC or not?
  15. M

    TitanOfDestruct v. THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF REDMONT

    What is your in-game name.
  16. M

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Maxib02 v. FTLCEO [2026] DCR 12

    Also, responses to motions, objections are automatic within customary timelines.
Back
Top