Search results

  1. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. Anchor Watch [2025] DCR 98

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO PRODUCE OWNERSHIP RECORDS Before the Court is a Motion to Compel filed by the Plaintiff in this case requesting an order to compel the disclosure of the identity of the owner, operator, and/or author of the news organisation known as...
  2. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Court has conducted sua sponte review of Plaintiff's discovery requests and finds that several of the demands appear facially overbroad and disproportionate in the light of the instant litigation. The Court intends to...
  3. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    We will now enter Discovery, which shall last 5 days. Discovery may be ended early if both Parties agree. @ToadKing @juniperfig
  4. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    SUSTAINED. Please note that the Commonwealth only requested that the bolded sections be struck. Those sections have been demonstrated to be false, given Plaintiff was given the opportunity to respond to allegations regarding their involvement in Anchor Watch News. Furthermore, an objection for...
  5. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    OVERRULED. Given that this additional Contempt Charge occurred in Plaintiff's private practice, I am inclined to give the Plaintiff some creative liberty in his argument here. The Commonwealth has included evidence of this Contempt Charge in Plaintiff's private practice in their Answer, so I can...
  6. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PARTIAL DISMISSAL Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by the Commonwealth on 26 November 2025. Upon review of the pleadings and record, consideration of the applicable law, and being fully advised, the Court issues the following...
  7. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    Thank you! You have 48 hours to present an Answer to Complaint.
  8. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    @Attorney General (@Kaiserin_) is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Asexualdinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95 In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline...
  9. Vennefly

    Wow

    Wow
  10. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Raz0Baz0 v. vishy1x [2025] DCR 92

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honour, Defendant's counsel responded to both of my objections without the leave of this Honourable Court, thereby speaking out of turn. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that these responses be...
  11. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Raz0Baz0 v. vishy1x [2025] DCR 92

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY Your Honour, This statement is false. The Verdict in FCR 78 does not state anything of the sorts. That Verdict determines that a Contract was not formed because the bid was ambiguous, which is not at all the same as what...
  12. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Raz0Baz0 v. vishy1x [2025] DCR 92

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY Your Honour, This statement is clearly perjurious. As clearly shown in P-003, Defendant at the very least held R$40,000 in his Volt Bank account at the time. Additionally, as shown in Plaintiff's Motion for Emergency...
  13. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Raz0Baz0 v. vishy1x [2025] DCR 92

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS Your Honour, Defendant bases their Motion to Dismiss on the allegation that a valid Contract was not formed between Plaintiff and Defendant. Defendant alleges a Contract was not legally formed because...
  14. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Raz0Baz0 v. vishy1x [2025] DCR 92

    Your Honour, may the Plaintiff respond?
  15. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Raz0Baz0 v. vishy1x [2025] DCR 92

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION Your Honour, A few days ago, all plots owned by the Defendant were evicted by the Commonwealth for inactivity: r034, r049, r129, c355, c549, c626. This means that, in short order, these plots will be auctioned...
  16. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Raz0Baz0 v. vishy1x [2025] DCR 92

    Your Honour, The Plaintiff has found conclusive evidence solving the mystery of the “missing” R$40K. The Plaintiff would like to request the leave of this Honourable Court to amend the Complaint to reflect these facts completely and to add supporting evidence. Respectfully submitted, Vennefly...
  17. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed 12700k v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 110

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 12700k Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. The Commonwealth AFFIRMS that on August 25, 2025, the Hon. ko531 issued an Emergency Injunction requiring that C745 and S104 not be evicted...
  18. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Raz0Baz0 v. vishy1x [2025] DCR 92

    Your Honour, I have been a little too specific in my Prayers for Relief, causing an unnecessary burden on the Defendant and the Department of Homeland Security if granted in full. I would therefore like to amend the Fourth Prayer for Relief, substituting "This includes, in this order:" with...
  19. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Raz0Baz0 v. vishy1x [2025] DCR 92

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Raz0Baz0 (represented by MZLD) Plaintiff v. vishy1x Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Raz0Baz0 (Plaintiff) 2. vishy1x (Defendant) II. FACTS On 28 October 2025 at...
  20. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Muggy21 v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 86

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour, The Plaintiff and the Defence seem to be in agreement that where the DCPolice plugin registers a Murder without exception, it constitutes prima facie evidence of guilt. What remains is the question whether or...
Back
Top