Search results

  1. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. vvirtue_ [2025] DCR 102

    In the sidebar, both Parties agreed to move directly to the Verdict following Defendant's Guilty plea. Court stands in RECESS pending Verdict.
  2. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. vvirtue_ [2025] DCR 102

    @Talion77 @Superwoops The Court will create a sidebar to discuss the continuation of this case.
  3. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. vvirtue_ [2025] DCR 102

    You have 48 hours to present a Plea.
  4. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. vvirtue_ [2025] DCR 102

    @vvirtue_, is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. vvirtue_ [2025] DCR 102. In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for such responses shall...
  5. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. EatYourGreens_ [2025] DCR 101

    @EatYourGreens (EatYourGreens_), is required to appear before the District Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. EatYourGreens_ [2025] DCR 101 In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The...
  6. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Adjourned GraprielJuice V. Aesyr [2025] DCR 100

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT SUMMARY JUDGEMENT ORDER The Court issues the following findings and orders: The Court, acting on its own initiative, has conducted an administrative investigation regarding the Defendant Aesyr_'s current status within the Commonwealth of...
  7. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Commonwealth of Redmont v. corstkiller00 [2025] DCR 99

    I hereby RECUSE from this case due to my involvement during my time as as a Prosecutor at the Department of Justice. This case will remain pending until Magistrate Dearev returns from his Leave of Absence.
  8. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    @ko531 @juniperfig IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS Before the Court is a Motion to Stay Proceedings made by Plaintiff, requesting to stay these proceedings until the conclusion of Commonwealth of Redmont v. AsexualDinosaur [2025] FCR 127. In...
  9. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    DENIED. The standards of evidence in a civil case, such as the one before the Court, differ substantially from those in a criminal proceeding. The Court has not ruled that it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the Plaintiff operates, manages, and/or controls Anchor Watch News. Rather, the...
  10. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    OVERRULED. The Plaintiff did not present a materially false fact here, they presented their legal opinion. The Plaintiff and their counsel are entitled to make legal arguments as they see fit, even if they are wrong, without fear of perjuring themselves.
  11. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    SUSTAINED, per the request of Plaintiff's counsel. The Court notes that, in general, it will not permit extensive or unfocused public inquiry into the conduct of other DOJ employees, as such inquiry is unduly burdensome and infringes upon the privacy rights of the employees involved. The...
  12. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    SUSTAINED. Although the Plaintiff is entitled to invoke his Fifth Charter Right, this is a civil proceeding, and the Court is permitted to draw an adverse inference from his refusal to clarify his involvement with Anchor Watch News. Accordingly, for the purposes of this case, the Court finds it...
  13. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS GRANTED. This case is STAYED until Plaintiff's new counsel enters an appearance or until 1 December 2025 at 02:00 UTC, whichever occurs first. The stay will lift automatically when either condition is met. Upon the...
  14. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Court, based on the submissions by the Commonwealth, considers it extremely unlikely that Plaintiff does not directly or indirectly operate, manage or control Anchor Watch. At the very least, Plaintiff had some...
  15. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. Anchor Watch [2025] DCR 98

    I'll take that as a no. Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, this matter is DISMISSED without prejudice.
  16. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. Anchor Watch [2025] DCR 98

    These comments are stricken as they were made out of turn. However, now that you are here, do you wish to be heard on the Court's findings or the Plaintiff's Motion to Nolle Prosequi?
  17. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    The Commonwealth has 48 hours to respond to Plaintiff's Response to the Order to Show Cause and to make any Objections it wishes against the Plaintiff's Discovery Requests. @juniperfig
  18. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    Thank you. Do you wish to amend your previous counsel's Discovery Requests or his Response to the Order to Show Cause?
  19. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    @asexualdinosaur is required to appear before the District Court in the case of AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95
  20. Vennefly

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. Anchor Watch [2025] DCR 98

    The Court, having requested Order 2 of the above Court Order be actioned by the Staff Team, enters the following documents received into the record. Accordingly, the Court identifies the Owner/Operator of "Anchor Watch" to be @asexualdinosaur. Magistrate Venne.
Back
Top