IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
BREACH OF PROCEDURE
Youre honor, this is an embarrassment of an "amicus" brief. The nature of amicus briefs is that of a third party providing insight, advice, or expertise, amicus meaning "friend" in latin.
The plaintiff sees beyond clear...
Permission to respond to this subpoena, your honor? I have a brief pertinent to the transparency of the following information listed in this post, and wish to divulge at the courts behest.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Relevance
We already have multiple expertise based witnesses, including Smallfries, who is another sitting justice. The plaintiff worries that by introducing another member of the supreme court as an expert witness, something we already have...
Revisiting this- You mentioned theatre companies in real life relying on donations or investments to maintain operations, How are you planning on doing outreach to secure these in the future?
With WPR complying with their subpoena, I can also confirm that I have no communications with EATB about the classification act [my DMS with them lacks anything, and anything else would have happened in the WPR server, which has been shown not to have anything pertinent either].
As the claims for relief expand to the scope of congressional oversight over Judicial FOIs as a whole, the plaintiff requests that *all* lodged since the passing of this act be presented for the sake of transparency.
Realistically, the plaintiff does not believe this would be too much of a...
MOTION TO COMPEL
The plaintiff wishes to compel the following from the commonwealth;
Discussion in congressional chats about any of the following;
Intending to submit judicial FOIs
Intending to see judicial verdicts
Discussion around Judicial Classifications.
The plaintiff sees these to be...
As it pertains to this case, the general public is a relevant party to the application of the law as it pertains to this case.
Colloquially, this is what is known as a public interest case.
Through congressional override of the balance of power, the ability for Congress to bully the courts into...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RELEVANCE
I fail to see the relevance to this. I have already stated that I was not involved in the original formation of the bill, and that they listed me as a cosponsor without my written consent. Either I am committing Perjury, or the more...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMMEND
The Plaintiff will be amending their case filing for the following:
9. Before the repeal of the original classification act, the power of Judicial FOI appeals was vested within the Federal Court.
7. Part IV, Section 32...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO COMPEL
The Plaintiff wishes to compel the following from the Commonwealth
1) Any discussion within Congress chat relating to the Passing of the current CMA
2) Any motions regarding Judicial FOI Appeals
3) Discussions surrounding...
To my knowledge, none exists that I can access until the WPR chats are recovered
Even then, the chats there were publicly available by anyone with the opt-in legislative role, and I don't think I made any comment to EATB about the bill in particular [this was multiple months ago at this time...
I did not read the bill at the time of it being originally put up, and would not have an opinion on it.
If I were to have read it, I would have found it to be unconstitutional.
I was never made aware of this actually! I don't have the screenshots as they were in the WPR legislative channel [which I am no longer affiliated with], but I was the most likely listed as cosponsor due to the fact that I was the person to originally come up with the idea of updating the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.