Search results

  1. Dr_Eksplosive

    Expungement: Granted lcn - Expungement Request

    @Freeze_Line is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of lcn- Expungement Request Please declare whether you approve or disprove of this expungement request upon arrival.
  2. Dr_Eksplosive

    Expungement: Granted Freeze_Line - Expungement Request

    @Mask3D_WOLF is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of Freeze_Line - Expungment Request Please state whether you approve or deny this expungement request.
  3. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Ko531 [2025] FCR 3

    @ko531 is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of Commonwelath of Redmont v. ko531.
  4. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    The Court recognises the failure on the plaintiff’s behalf. The timer for an answer to complaint/motion to dismiss is halted for 12 hours. The Plaintiff is to respond to the interrogatory posed by the Defense, or be held in contempt.
  5. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    Apologies, I misread the case filing. The Defense has 48 hours from this post to file an answer to complaint. apologies for the inconvenience, i am working from mobile.
  6. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    The time allotted for discovery has now elapsed. The Defense now has 48 hours to enter a plea.
  7. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    Sustained. While the question makes it clear that 1.2 million was a value obtained from a speculative bid.,The question asks the value the government gives the property, which as the defense has pointed out, cannot be assigned without a finalised public transaction. Prosecution may either...
  8. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed xEndeavour v. AlexanderLove [2025] DCR 1

    Motion to recuse is denied. The defense has failed to provide any evidence relating to direct bias against them by the magistrate in question. While perception/appearance of bias is a valid reason, I will be ruling against as it sets poor precedent regarding that any party of a case can sue the...
  9. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    Thank you. Discovery is set to end 72 hours from this message, or whenever both parties to agree to end it early.
  10. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF MANDAMUS Upon review of the merits of the case, the Court has determined to accept the emergency injunction. The properties of c068,c069,c070 & c071, more commonly known as 'Abbotts' are to be frozen. These properties may not be...
  11. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed MrEntomology v. bigpappa140

    Granted. Case dismissed with prejudice.
  12. Dr_Eksplosive

    Happy birthday vern!

    Happy birthday vern!
  13. Dr_Eksplosive

    Appeal: Accepted [2024] FCR 124 - Appeal

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT 2-0 Decision the Supreme Court has decided to Accept this appeal. The Supreme Court hereby overrules Judge Jakovus’ sentencing guidelines. No criminal forfeits any rights whatsoever, regardless if they are a repeat offender or not. However...
  14. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    @Freeze_Line is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of FlyingBlocs v. The Commonwealth of Redmont.
  15. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned FlyingBlocks v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 1

    Motion Denied. The Plaintiff has already rectified what appears to have been an error in case filing. Furthermore, consider this your first and final warning for speaking out of turn. Summons are yet to be issued.
  16. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nacholebraa [2024] SCR 37

    Thank you for the confirmation prosecutors. In a 2-0 decision, the Supreme Court has decided to grant the motion to dismiss. The court finds the prosecution failed to submit sufficient evidence during filing and discovery to warrant a continuation of this trial, especially as the charges make...
  17. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nacholebraa [2024] SCR 37

    Please provide proof of employment within the DOJ else you will be held in contempt of court.
  18. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nacholebraa [2024] SCR 37

    Granted. You may have an additional 24 hours to post your opening statement from this message.
  19. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nacholebraa [2024] SCR 37

    Granted. I made a miscalculation in my previous statement. Please use the correct amount of time allotted, and request an extension if necessary.
  20. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nacholebraa [2024] SCR 37

    In regards to the first statement, the objection is Overruled. The statement is an established fact within the cases the prosecution submitted as evidence. In regards to the second statement, the objection is Sustained. The prosecution has failed to provide evidence to prove the Defendant's...
Back
Top