Search results

  1. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned SCR 1 [2025] The Patriotic Coalition of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    Apologies, previous order is rescinded. Defendant has 48 hours to file an answer to complaint. The entire sheet.
  2. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Ko531 [2025] FCR 3

    Granted. You have 12 hours from your messge.
  3. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned SCR 1 [2025] The Patriotic Coalition of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    With the matter out of the way, the court will be resuming. The Plaintiff has 48 hours to post their opening statement. Request an extension if necessary.
  4. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned SCR 1 [2025] The Patriotic Coalition of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    Denied. The Supreme Court has ruled, 2-0. The court has determined that the voter in question (Voter 2) was misnoted. True record of the voter can be found in later entries of the document. Election results were not miscounted as a result of this faulty notation, and thus there exists no...
  5. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Ko531 [2025] FCR 3

    Witnesses are hereby dismissed. Thank you for your time. With witness examination out of the way, the court shall move to closing statements. The Prosecution has 48 hours to post their closing remarks. Late submissions will not be tolerated. Please request an extension if necessary.
  6. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned SCR 1 [2025] The Patriotic Coalition of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT WRIT OF MANDAMUS Upon close review and discussion regarding the evidence called into question, the (former) Secretary of State @Real42 is hereby ordered to make themselves present within the judiciary discord and provide version history and...
  7. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned SCR 1 [2025] The Patriotic Coalition of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    That is not necessary at this point in time. Your request is denied.
  8. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned SCR 1 [2025] The Patriotic Coalition of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    By Order of the Supreme Court, both Plaintiff and Defense are to make themselves present in the Judiciary discord. A closed court hearing will take place regarding the validity of the evidence. Please make yourselves present within 72 hours.
  9. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned SCR 1 [2025] The Patriotic Coalition of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    What do you wish to share, and what is your relevant expertise?
  10. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AlexanderLove v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 7

    You may. Please file your response within 48 hours.
  11. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned SCR 1 [2025] The Patriotic Coalition of Redmont v. The Commonwealth of Redmont

    Given that the court did not move past discovery, and the circumstances relating to the acquisition of the evidence did not permit it to be submitted during discovery, the court will be allowing the late submission. The Defendant has 24 hours to evaluate and consider the new evidence...
  12. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned The Commonwealth of Redmont v. Ko531 [2025] FCR 3

    Thank you prosecutor. Defense may proceed to cross examine the witnesses. Post your questions within the next 48 hours. Witnesses are to respond within a subsequent 48 hours. You may ask a follow up within 48 hours of the witness’s response.
  13. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Dimitre977 v. kesballo [2025] FCR 6

    Granted. Court is adjourned pending summary judgement.
  14. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AlexanderLove v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 7

    You may, apologies for my absence. Please file your answer to complaint within the next 48 hours.
  15. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned RoryyyMC v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 129

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT RoryyyMC v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 129 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The Executive Officer Freedom Act is a complex change that was passed without referendum. The Plaintiff argues this is because it permits the government...
  16. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Vernicia v. RylandW [2025] FCR 5

    Thank you. With the matter of representation settled, Discovery is set for a maximum of 72 hours.
  17. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. OmegaBiebel [2025] FCR 4

    Rejected. Facts are to be disputed in an answer to complaint using evidence submitted during discovery; not in motion to dismiss. As far as the court is concerned, the facts remain undisputed till the defense asserts otherwise in a response filing. The use of Rule 5.14 (Factual Error) is for...
  18. Dr_Eksplosive

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AlexanderLove v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 7

    Overruled. Should the evidence be nothing but an attempt to cast the defendant’s actions in a new light, the plaintiff should be able to disprove this with evidence and facts, not conjecture from coincidence. The Defense has asserted that the evidence is to assist their opening argument, and...
Back
Top