Search results

  1. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. AtomicRedstoner [2026] FCR 6

    Your Honour, until you can consider a sua sponte dismissal after reading our Brief, the Defense requests a 24-hour extension on plea.
  2. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. AtomicRedstoner [2026] FCR 6

    @Muggy21 Your Honour, this was entered by accident; there are no further corrections, but I would have no problem re-submitting with a final brief.
  3. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. AtomicRedstoner [2026] FCR 6

    RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 1. Government Participation in Criminal Activity is Questionable The question raised before the court today is whether the Government should participate in alleged criminal activity. The Defense believes that the Government should absolutely not. The Criminal...
  4. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. AtomicRedstoner [2026] FCR 6

    @Muggy21 Your Honour, I might need a 24-hour extension on the OSC, most probably not, but to be on the safer side, I request that the court please grant it. :)
  5. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. AtomicRedstoner [2026] FCR 6

    Your Honour, to be proactive (and so as not to get a contempt charge), I request that the court grant a 72-hour timeline for a plea due to the nature of PD work (as well as IRL reasons)
  6. T

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. AtomicRedstoner [2026] FCR 6

    May it (not) please the court, PD is present. I request a 48 hour deadline for the OSC.
  7. T

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Matthew100x v. AbsInf [2026] DCR 16

    @dearev Your Honour, I apologise for the ping and disturbing the court while it is in recess, but counsel (that is me) would like to know when we can expect a verdict. This case is a default judgment case, and it has been almost 10 days. We understand in-real life events have kept you busy and...
  8. T

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. Gooseguy1934 [2026] DCR 17

    Your Honour, this can be disregarded along with #7.
  9. T

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. Gooseguy1934 [2026] DCR 17

    @dearev Your Honour, in DCR 5 [2026], the Court also granted the request to postpone the deadline for an answer. Similarly, the Defense requests a postponement of the deadline for an answer. The Defense cannot prepare an answer to facts/evidence that may be struck from the record; therefore...
  10. T

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. Gooseguy1934 [2026] DCR 17

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - IMPROPER EVIDENCE Your Honour, In SCR 20 [2025], the SCR ruled Following this precedent, in DCR 5 [2026], the Defense requested evidence that was not independently corroborated to be struck, and the DCR granted this action...
  11. T

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Vernicia v. Gooseguy1934 [2026] DCR 17

    @dearev Your Honour, PD is present, please give me 72 hours to present an answer.
  12. T

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Maxib02 v. FTLCEO [2026] DCR 12

    In the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont To whichever honourable magistrate it may concern, Your Honour(s), It is impossible to continue with the remaining period of discovery without a presiding officer present. Any proceedings of discovery would go against the spirit of court...
  13. T

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nie_lot [2026] DCR 15

    Your Honour, Defense requests a sidebar
  14. T

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nie_lot [2026] DCR 15

    @dearev Your Honour, may we be heard on sentencing?
  15. T

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Nie_lot [2026] DCR 15

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PLEA The Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. Nie_lot Defendant I. ENTRY OF PLEA 1. GUILTY on the charge of Obstruction of Justice By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am...
  16. T

    Appeal: Accepted [2025] DCR 108 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 7

    RESPONSE TO THE OBJECTION Your Honour, we aren't asking to respond to how the Appellant interprets the law, but how the Appellant filed a brief where some parts of it were misinterpreted by them and are possibly misleading the court. We do not want to file another brief, but we retract our...
  17. T

    Appeal: Accepted [2025] DCR 108 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 7

    Your Honour, there are blatant misinterpretations about our brief that may mislead the court, may we respond to those parts in specific to help clarify?
  18. T

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Maxib02 v. FTLCEO [2026] DCR 12

    Your Honour, the Plaintiff requests an extension of discovery by 96 hours. This means we would be starting trial on Monday.
  19. T

    Appeal: Accepted [2025] DCR 108 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 7

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO APPELANT’S BRIEF (APPELLEE’S BRIEF) The Appellee respectfully submits that the judgment of the DCR remain affirmed and that this appeal be rejected. I. AFFIRMATION OF KEY DATES The Appellee affirms the above Key Dates would also...
  20. T

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Maxib02 v. FTLCEO [2026] DCR 12

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER The Plaintiff respectfully requests reconsideration of the Court’s decision striking Facts 1 and 2. P-020 and P-022 establish that the Palantir company account maintained control over the Palantir News server. D-003...
Back
Top