RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
1. Government Participation in Criminal Activity is Questionable
The question raised before the court today is whether the Government should participate in alleged criminal activity.
The Defense believes that the Government should absolutely not.
The Criminal...
@Muggy21
Your Honour,
I might need a 24-hour extension on the OSC, most probably not, but to be on the safer side, I request that the court please grant it. :)
Your Honour, to be proactive (and so as not to get a contempt charge), I request that the court grant a 72-hour timeline for a plea due to the nature of PD work (as well as IRL reasons)
@dearev
Your Honour, I apologise for the ping and disturbing the court while it is in recess, but counsel (that is me) would like to know when we can expect a verdict. This case is a default judgment case, and it has been almost 10 days.
We understand in-real life events have kept you busy and...
@dearev
Your Honour, in DCR 5 [2026], the Court also granted the request to postpone the deadline for an answer.
Similarly, the Defense requests a postponement of the deadline for an answer.
The Defense cannot prepare an answer to facts/evidence that may be struck from the record; therefore...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - IMPROPER EVIDENCE
Your Honour,
In SCR 20 [2025], the SCR ruled
Following this precedent, in DCR 5 [2026], the Defense requested evidence that was not independently corroborated to be struck, and the DCR granted this action...
In the District Court of the Commonwealth of Redmont
To whichever honourable magistrate it may concern,
Your Honour(s),
It is impossible to continue with the remaining period of discovery without a presiding officer present. Any proceedings of discovery would go against the spirit of court...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
PLEA
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Prosecution
v.
Nie_lot
Defendant
I. ENTRY OF PLEA
1. GUILTY on the charge of Obstruction of Justice
By making this submission, I agree I understand the penalties of lying in court and the fact that I am...
RESPONSE TO THE OBJECTION
Your Honour, we aren't asking to respond to how the Appellant interprets the law, but how the Appellant filed a brief where some parts of it were misinterpreted by them and are possibly misleading the court.
We do not want to file another brief, but we retract our...
Your Honour, there are blatant misinterpretations about our brief that may mislead the court, may we respond to those parts in specific to help clarify?
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO APPELANT’S BRIEF (APPELLEE’S BRIEF)
The Appellee respectfully submits that the judgment of the DCR remain affirmed and that this appeal be rejected.
I. AFFIRMATION OF KEY DATES
The Appellee affirms the above Key Dates would also...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER
The Plaintiff respectfully requests reconsideration of the Court’s decision striking Facts 1 and 2.
P-020 and P-022 establish that the Palantir company account maintained control over the Palantir News server.
D-003...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.