Search results

  1. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131

    The defense would like to ask the court to allow the defense to conduct follow up questions after all answers to all questions from all witnesses.
  2. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131

    Your honor @MgChamp's answers are vital for our defense so we ask the court not to continue to closing statements until after they answer.
  3. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131

    Your honor additionally I move for the court to find MgChamp in contempt of court as he has failed to respond to the writ of summons which is a lawful order of the court requiring the requested person to appear before the court. This clearly constitutes a contempt of court charge and as so the...
  4. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Throughout the entirety of this case you have seen how the defendant had blatantly disregarded his contractual obligations to the plaintiff. It is clear that not only did the plaintiff fulfill their contractual obligations but granted the...
  5. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY The defendant's counsel has intentionally lied about the plaintiff's counsel actions in attempt to dismiss the case. The defendant's counsel has falsely stated that "Plaintiff's failure to provide an opening statement and disregard for these...
  6. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    Sorry the first part was the draft of the closing, I’ve been incredibly busy with family matters recently may I amend this message your honor?
  7. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT @Pepecuu @Superwoops plaintiffs opening
  8. RiggoSoft

    Accepted RiggoSoft - Grant Application

    Some of the money will also be used for the procurement of the land.
  9. RiggoSoft

    Accepted RiggoSoft - Grant Application

    $25k- S087, We have already put all offices in here for our company as well as our clients to use. $25k - C306, we plan on building luxury apartments in here. $20k - C171, we plan on building a supermarket here for people to buy fireworks, food, gas, etc.
  10. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131

    Sorry I thought this was another trial I am involved in
  11. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131

    If you overruled these would that mean my questions are unstuck from the record?
  12. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131

    Your honor may I respond to this?
  13. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Superwoops v. Red Nose Capital [2025] FCR 136

    To my knowledge no assets have been moved? That’s the entire reason I’m asking for this order to be lifted
  14. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Superwoops v. Red Nose Capital [2025] FCR 136

    Confused about this question. Do you want to know our reorganization plan, or are asking if we have paid the creditor Oakridge Community Bank because we haven’t hence why I am not withdrawing myself from this case.
  15. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Superwoops v. Red Nose Capital [2025] FCR 136

    Here is the proof of representation
  16. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Superwoops v. Red Nose Capital [2025] FCR 136

    May I send proof your honor?
  17. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Superwoops v. Red Nose Capital [2025] FCR 136

    Your honor as Sagamo2008’s attorney regarding his bankruptcy proceedings may I object to this order?
  18. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    No response to objection 1 Response to objection 2: The plaintiff is once again asking the witnesses feeling about the bonds, it is also relevant again to assess the damages and humiliation your client has caused to the plaintiff.
  19. RiggoSoft

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    We ask for the witnesses feeling on investments offered by the bank we don't lead them into any answer and bonds offered is very clear as bonds offered by the bank
Back
Top