Search results

@craftysciguy is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. CraftySciGuy [2025] SCR 13.

By unanimous decision, this court finds the plaintiff lacks standing to sue before the Supreme Court. As with ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 80, the court believes that removal from office is only available as a judicial remedy for the State itself to pursue in cases where the...

The Commonwealth shall have forty-eight hours to present its Answer to the Complaint.

@Attorney General's Office is required to appear before the Supreme Court in the case of bigpappa140 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] SCR 11.

- Username: Smallfries (Discord) Smallfries4 (Minecraft) - What are your strengths and weaknesses?: I'm old and experienced, and have been told I'm relatively competent. I try not to make decisions without being informed and thinking through it properly. I try to stay away from politics and...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Even when taking into account the extra 12 hours that the Judge may have granted, the Defendant was still late to relate the testimony he was given almost a full week to produce. Defendant's testimony holds 406...

The evidence the Plaintiff provided does not show what the Defendant says it shows—only that the bond was called and that it should eventually be paid back. That evidence did not show that the Defendant asked the Exchange to pay them back. To say otherwise is a clear misrepresentation of the...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your honor, The arguments of the defense are quite concerning and border on perjury. It is frightening to see this total collapse in legal standards and professionalism as the defense misrepresents, obfuscates, and in some...

We would like to request a 4 hour extension to 12:09AM Central time, tomorrow morning.

The Plaintiff requests a 48 hour extension due to practical IRL concerns.

Username: Smallfries Total Playtime: 3 Days 22 Hours When are you most active? Central Time (US). Most active from 3-10pm that time. Requirements: - Minimum of 48 hours of play time. - I am available on Discord. - I show in my application why you are best suited for the position. - I am able...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Respectfully, your honor, Opposing counsel's continued breach of procedure with constant informal dialogue provides unhelpful and cluttering messages that do nothing to further justice in this matter. Further...

Your honor, the defense simply saying "we still dispute this" does not mean it truly is in dispute. The Plaintiff believes they have conclusively proven their point, and would like summary judgment in order to not waste the court's precious time.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT The Plaintiff moves that the Plaintiff in this case be granted summary judgment, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: 1. The Defendant has had 80 hours to file an opening statement, 2. The Defendant has...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT May it please the court, My name is Smallfries and I represent the Plaintiff, MegaMinerM. The case before the court today is one of immense importance for the finance sector in Redmont, and should not be taken lightly...

Your honor, The Plaintiff has a response, but asks to withhold judgment until the opening statement for the Plaintiff is made, which should suffice as a response.

The Plaintiff requests a forty-eight hour extension due to extenuating personal circumstances.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER The Plaintiff submits that the ruling above be granted a final reconsideration, on the basis that: 1. The subject matter at-hand has its roots and is formed from the same case and controversy as a similar previous case...

Your honor, Nothing was ruled on, no final decision was made. Further, this is a matter of importance before the Court and the comments above were an important explanation to a legitimate grievance the Plaintiff has.

Your honor, The Plaintiff concedes that there does not appear to be any statutory legal grounds for the removal of a lawyer based on Conflicts of Interest incurred as a result of previously ruling on a case as a Judicial Officer. However, the Plaintiff maintains that this is still an odd and...