Search results

Defendant has 24 hours to respond to your brief if they so choose.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT VERDICT 12700k v. Trincus Corp. [2025] DCR 58 I. PLAINTIFF’S POSITION 1. The Plaintiff entered into a contract with Trincus Corp, paying $50,000 in exchange for shares. 2. Trincus Corp failed to deliver the shares as outlined in their contract. II. DEFENDANT’S...

Motion for default judgement is granted. Court is in recess pending verdict.

Absinf has failed to appear. @12700k, do you wish for the case to proceed to Default Judgement?

Thank you for the prompt reply. The Defendant has 48 hours to post their opening statement.

Let me make it very clear that I do not appreciate the DOJ's attempts to place the blame of the case's filing faults solely at the feet of a newer prosecutor. It is the responsibility of the DOJ's leadership to assist their prosecutors and to ensure that their filings are accurate. Above all...

Plaintiff has 48 hours to deliver their opening statement.

We shall now enter Discovery. Discovery will last 5 days, or shorter if both parties agree to end it sooner.

I will allow it. I will also extend the same courtesy to the defendant regarding your statement.

I am giving the Commonwealth 24 hours to respond to the Motion to Dismiss.

Motion to Amend is granted.

You have 48 hours to file your Answer to Complaint.

You may. Please file the brief within 24 hours.

Sustained. The comment will be stricken, and zLost is hereby charged with Contempt of Court.

You have 48 hours to provide an Answer to Complaint.

We shall now enter Discovery. Discovery shall last 5 days, or less if both parties agree to end it earlier.

Moving this to the Supreme Court, as only they have the power to remove or bar someone from office.

Thank you. The Defendant has 48 hours to present their brief.

The plaintiff has 48 hours to present their Closing Arguments.

You can consider this an Order to Show Cause. The honorable JunkCereal previously made use of this Court Order in Lex Titanum v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 72. Currently, this Court is considering granting the Motion to Dismiss on grounds of Immunity. However, this Court also was not...