Absolutely not.
Counselor, you were lead counsel in FCR 89. You are currently contesting the verdict of FCR 100 in FCR 110. The aforementioned cases all, in some way, concern S104 and C475 and who their rightful owner should be. You are absolutely biased against the plaintiff here, and I do...
Sustained. Plaintiff won't be held in Contempt of Court this time, but they are warned not to speak out of turn again.
Partially sustained. I don't believe there's a rule against introducing new evidence in a response to a Motion to Dismiss, but the comments are being struck away. Plaintiff is...
At the request of the plaintiff, this case is dismissed with prejudice. However, the Emergency Injunction will remain in effect until such time the medical facility is constructed. I will instruct the DHS to carry out the fine.
I would like to briefly reassure all parties that your objections and motions have been noted. A reply is forthcoming, but due to the nature of the case, significant research is required. I shall endeavor to have a continuation of this case shortly. My apologies for the wait.
While the plaintiff's arguments are insightful and worthy of consideration, I do believe that the safest course of action is to enjoin this case until such time Gribble19 v The Exchange, Inc. [2025] FCR 102 is resolved.
So ordered,
Judge AmityBlamity
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.