I am told that consistant with section 4.4 of OCB's CoI, "4.4 Removal & Replacement. The board may remove officers (including the CEO) by amajority vote with documented legal reasoning. Vacancies are filled by Board appointment untilthe next formal appointment procedure decided by the Board." It...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI
The plaintiff no longer wishes to pursue this case in light of large issues arising from mistakes made in filing. We humbly petition the court to dismiss this case without prejudice so that we may re file.
Hello your honor,
I am here notifying the court of a change in the plaintiff' s council, I will be representing Oakridge Community Bank from here on out.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO STRIKE
The Plaintiff states in Fact 1 that, “‘Tax Brackets’ or other related terms such as ‘bracket amounts’ are technical and specific terms that refer to a specific way of calculating taxes.” This definition is not a fact - it is a...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS - LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION - LACK OF CLAIM
The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
Rule 5.5, Lack of Claim
In the appeal of Anthony_Ord v...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CLOSING STATEMENT
When the Commonwealth seizes a company in order to protect the citizens of Redmont, it is, in part, subject to the liability incurred by any director/manager under the Legal Entity Act. As seen in Privacy Matters v. Nexalin...
Your honor in post #26 On Reconsideration for Commonwealth's Motion for Dismissal you state,
The Defense requests consideration of the matter of whether the Plaintiff's argument has been sufficiently plead. We further request that the Plantiff be ordered to show cause before closing statements...
Your Honor,
I was perhaps overzealous in my initial filing for this case. What further information is the court looking for in an appellant brief that wouldn’t just be a restating of the already posted appeal?
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER
Your Honor, objection 1 is objecting to
In defense of the question being asked and answered, the Defense alleges that this question is essentially re-asking the following questions posed by the Defense:
This subject has...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - ASKED AND ANSWERED
In regards to the first question, it essentiallty restates the defense's 5th and 6th question with no meaningful variation.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - FOUNDATION
Elysia...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE
These questions were posed nearly an hour after the deadline for cross examination had passed. The Defense therefore moves that these questions be struck from the record.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.