Hi @Maxib02, sorry about the long wait.
Could you please state whether you are still interested in applying for this grant and if so, clarify which grant pool you are applying to?
The reason I ask is because the Active Business Bonus Grant has a cap of $2,000 every 4 weeks, which is less than...
The Plaintiff objects to this request on the grounds that the Defendant showing up does not change the material facts of the case.
We suggest moving on. Opposing counsel can change their original answer in Discovery should anything new be revealed stemming from their discussion with the...
It is already an irregular thing (to say the least) that the Defendant did not post the December investors' update or failed to communicate at all with investors despite constant reminders and Discord pings. The Plaintiff feels as though this irregularity does pose a risk.
The own evidence...
Your honour,
The contract shown in P-01 is ambiguous, and as such unenforceable in this Court.
To begin, the contract stipulates that:
"[...] the borrowed amount will accrue 4% MPY on the initial principal amount of $20,000 [...]"
The Act of Congress - Credit Standards Act specifically states...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER
Your honour, there are two cases involved here. Reconsidering the extension on this case would mean one of the two Plaintiffs (even if both are awarded damages) would take priority over the other, as said...
Additionally, I ask that Magistrate Vennefly’s contempt of court charges are not enforced until the conclusion of this appeal, following what was done in the following appeal:
Post in thread '[2025] DCR 106 - Appeal'
Appeal: Accepted - [2025] DCR 106 - Appeal
Username: Superwoops
I am representing myself
What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] DCR 96 - Contempt of Court charge
Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: In Session - Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96
Basis for Appeal: I am appealing all three contempt charges in the above case...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO AMEND
On second thought, I request to amend my filing in order to present the Defense with the proper evidence for their answer. This is regarding P-003 and P-004 only.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CLOSING STATEMENT
Your honour,
I have not much else to say in this case.
Lawsuit: Adjourned - Bombaz2005 v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2024] FCR 78 is used for two distinct arguments in my opening.
The Plaintiff argues that it does not...
Your honour, due to the fact that the ruling on the proposed Motion to Reconsider will materially affect the arguments and framing proposed in the Commonwealth's opening statement, we ask for an extension of the deadline to file opening statements. Specifically, the Commonwealth requests that...
The Prosecution would also like to respectfully ask for a 30-hour extension, as the outcome of the above motion's ruling greatly affects the content of our Opening Statement.
Additionally, it will be New Year's Eve tomorrow.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER
Your honour,
The Prosecution respectfully moves for a reconsideration on the ruling that struck exhibit P-001 from the record.
On admissibility
Editability is not exclusive to chat logs. Unfortunately, many pieces of...
The Defense would like to respectfully ask the Honorable Magistrate @dearev about the status of this case seeing as the time for Discovery has elapsed.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.