IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CLOSING STATEMENT
Your honour,
I have not much else to say in this case. I believe my Opening Statement covers my arguments sufficiently. Furthermore, the Plaintiff's closing arguments have not addressed my arguments at all.
The Credit...
This was a genuine mistype which should have said Closing, not Opening. I do believe Your Honour did interpret it as such, so no harm done, but I do apologise for this mistake.
Your honour,
Hours since the deadline for the Plaintiff's closing statement have passed. I ask the Court to uphold Lawsuit: Adjourned - Superpacman04 v. the Government of Democracy Craft [2020] FCR 1, binding precedent from a higher court, and side with the defendant in this case for the...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS
Your honour,
The Defense's Motion to Dismiss is in violation of rule 5.2 of the Court Rules and Procedures, which specifically state that "A Motion to Dismiss must be submitted at any time before the beginning of...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT
Your honour,
The Commonwealth of Redmont as a whole has been damaged by the actions of RealImza, an individual who has not acted in accordance with their official duties and who has neglected the trust that their voters...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
The Defense feels as though all points in contention have been thoroughly addressed in opening statements, and no new evidence was introduced in Discovery.
Additionally, witness testimony was struck almost in its...
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT
Your honour,
I believe the evidence is enough to prove my claims in full. I therefore move for summary judgement as agreed to in the sidebar by both parties.
Your honour, I am requesting a sidebar. In the meantime I would like to notify @RiggoSoft that your client’s assets are still under injunction. I do not understand why his assets were moved while they were under court order.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - SPECULATION
Your honour, this question is asking the witness to speculate ("do you think you will invest") as to future events which the witness has not directly observed.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - CALLS FOR A CONCLUSION, LEADING, AMBIGUOUS
This question is asking for the opinion of the witness (calls for a conclusion), it imposes a condition at the beginning of the question (leading) and "how do you think of bonds offered"...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - SPECULATION, RELEVANCE
The Defense objects to these questions on the grounds that they are asking the witness to speculate on whether they might deposit money or buy bonds in the future. Since the witness has not directly...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE, LEADING, COMPOUND
These questions assume that my client is the borrower behind bond OCB-003, which has not been proven by any evidence provided by the Plaintiff. The burden is on them to prove this...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - LEADING
The question seems to imply that my client defaulted on a bond. The only thing in question is whether my client defaulted on a loan.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - RELEVANCE
Your honour,
These questions are not relevant to the issue at hand, which is to ascertain whether my client committed breach of contract or not. The contract or Discord conversation never mentioned there being a bond...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.