Search results

  1. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your honour, I have not much else to say in this case. I believe my Opening Statement covers my arguments sufficiently. Furthermore, the Plaintiff's closing arguments have not addressed my arguments at all. The Credit...
  2. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    This was a genuine mistype which should have said Closing, not Opening. I do believe Your Honour did interpret it as such, so no harm done, but I do apologise for this mistake.
  3. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    Your honour, Hours since the deadline for the Plaintiff's closing statement have passed. I ask the Court to uphold Lawsuit: Adjourned - Superpacman04 v. the Government of Democracy Craft [2020] FCR 1, binding precedent from a higher court, and side with the defendant in this case for the...
  4. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. ImzaKRD [2025] SCR 20

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS Your honour, The Defense's Motion to Dismiss is in violation of rule 5.2 of the Court Rules and Procedures, which specifically state that "A Motion to Dismiss must be submitted at any time before the beginning of...
  5. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. ImzaKRD [2025] SCR 20

    Your honour, may the Commonwealth respond to the Motion to Dismiss?
  6. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. ImzaKRD [2025] SCR 20

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your honour, The Commonwealth of Redmont as a whole has been damaged by the actions of RealImza, an individual who has not acted in accordance with their official duties and who has neglected the trust that their voters...
  7. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT The Defense feels as though all points in contention have been thoroughly addressed in opening statements, and no new evidence was introduced in Discovery. Additionally, witness testimony was struck almost in its...
  8. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Superwoops v. Red Nose Capital [2025] FCR 136

    MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT Your honour, I believe the evidence is enough to prove my claims in full. I therefore move for summary judgement as agreed to in the sidebar by both parties.
  9. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Superwoops v. Red Nose Capital [2025] FCR 136

    Your honour, I am submitting the following pieces of evidence:
  10. S

    Information Expression of Interest - Public Defender

    Welcome back! Please join the Judiciary server.
  11. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Superwoops v. Red Nose Capital [2025] FCR 136

    Your honour, I am requesting a sidebar. In the meantime I would like to notify @RiggoSoft that your client’s assets are still under injunction. I do not understand why his assets were moved while they were under court order.
  12. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - SPECULATION Your honour, this question is asking the witness to speculate ("do you think you will invest") as to future events which the witness has not directly observed. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT...
  13. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - CALLS FOR A CONCLUSION, LEADING, AMBIGUOUS This question is asking for the opinion of the witness (calls for a conclusion), it imposes a condition at the beginning of the question (leading) and "how do you think of bonds offered"...
  14. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE Again, this does not pertain to this case. See #66.
  15. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - SPECULATION, RELEVANCE The Defense objects to these questions on the grounds that they are asking the witness to speculate on whether they might deposit money or buy bonds in the future. Since the witness has not directly...
  16. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - ASSUMES FACTS NOT IN EVIDENCE, LEADING, COMPOUND These questions assume that my client is the borrower behind bond OCB-003, which has not been proven by any evidence provided by the Plaintiff. The burden is on them to prove this...
  17. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - LEADING The question seems to imply that my client defaulted on a bond. The only thing in question is whether my client defaulted on a loan.
  18. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - RELEVANCE Your honour, These questions are not relevant to the issue at hand, which is to ascertain whether my client committed breach of contract or not. The contract or Discord conversation never mentioned there being a bond...
Back
Top