Search results

  1. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    Pursuant to Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement), the Plaintiff requests the Defendant to produce the following materials relevant to the case: 1. All case assignments and work product for State Prosecutor Nacho from April 2025 to present, including: List of all cases...
  2. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    From the Plaintiff: "I do not directly or indirectly operate, manage, or control Anchor Watch"
  3. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    Pursuant to Rule 4.6 (Submission of Discovery, Voluntarily), the Plaintiff submits the following into evidence:
  4. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    Your Honour, The Commonwealth's perjury objection should be denied for the following reasons: I. THE COMMONWEALTH MISCHARACTERISES THE COMPLAINT THROUGH SELECTIVE QUOTATION The Commonwealth quotes: This selective quotation creates a misleading impression. The complete statement reads: Read...
  5. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    Your Honour, The Plaintiff will file a substantive response to the Commonwealth's 2nd Objection within the timeframe permitted under Court Rules. Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court refrain from ruling on the objection until Plaintiff's response has been filed and considered.
  6. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    Your Honour, Plaintiff agrees with the Commonwealth's Motion to Dismiss. If the Department of Justice has compensated AsexualDinosaur for all outstanding salary and wages from his employment during November 2025, then Prayer for Relief 1 seeking compensatory damages is moot. Final payments...
  7. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96

    Your Honour, As the Defendant lacks Discord, I have taken it upon myself to uncover the Defendant's forum account. To ensure they are properly notified, and to ensure the case filing is accurately reflected, I request leave of this court to update the case filing to include the Defendant's...
  8. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Muggy21 (represented by ToadKing) Plaintiff v. Riverardd (aka @Mrriverardd) Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendants as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Muggy21 2. Riverardd (aka @Mrriverardd) II. FACTS 1. On...
  9. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Adjourned in re: S104/C745 [2025] FCR 124

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT EXPLANATORY BRIEF RE: Settlement Negotiations in Pepecuu v. MattTheSavvy [2025] FCR 100 I respectfully submit this explanatory brief, as authorised by the Court's Order, to provide context regarding my role in negotiating the settlement...
  10. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Adjourned in re: S104/C745 [2025] FCR 124

    Your Honour, I respectfully notify the Court of my intention to request permission to submit a short explanatory brief regarding my role as Public Defender in Pepecuu v MattTheSavvy [2025] FCR 100, specifically concerning the negotiation and structure of the settlement agreement adopted by the...
  11. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECUSE Plaintiff requests that Magistrate dearev, the sole Magistrate in the DCR, recuse from this case as they are a named witness. Plaintiff requests that an FCR judge be assigned to this case.
  12. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION asexualdinosaur (represented by ToadKing) Plaintiff v. Commonwealth of Redmont Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendants as follows: I. PARTIES 1. asexualdinosaur 2. Kaiserin_ (Attorney General) 3...
  13. ToadKing

    Appeal: Denied [2025] SCR 18 - Appeal

    Username: ToadKing__ I am representing myself What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] SCR 18 Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Adjourned - ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] SCR 18 Basis for Appeal: I. INTRODUCTION The Appellant respectfully requests that this Court reconsider its...
  14. ToadKing

    Appeal: Accepted [2025] FCR 117 - Appeal

    The Appellant cannot respond to something which was never filed to begin with. The Appellant opts not to file a response and requests this appeal is now ruled on. This Court doesn't seem to want to hold parties accountable for their inaction. The Appellee has already wasted mine and my clients...
  15. ToadKing

    Appeal: Accepted [2025] FCR 117 - Appeal

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE The Appellee was ordered to file their brief within seventy-two hours. That deadline has now expired. The Appellee requested no extension of time, nor made it apparent that they would be delayed. It has been...
  16. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] SCR 18

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE The Commonwealth was ordered to file their closing statement within seventy-two hours. That deadline has now expired. The Commonwealth requested a 24-hour extension but the Court did not rule on that request...
  17. ToadKing

    Appeal: Accepted [2025] FCR 117 - Appeal

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT APPELLANT BRIEF This appeal presents a straightforward question: Can a Federal Court refuse to exercise its express constitutional jurisdiction over a challenge to executive overreach by invoking doctrines that directly contradict its own...
  18. ToadKing

    Appeal: Denied [2025] FCR 119 - Contempt of Court Charge - Appeal

    Username: ToadKing__ I am representing myself What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] FCR 119 - Contempt of Court Charge Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Pending - Volt Bank, Inc. v. .AstuteSundew823 [2025] FCR 119 Basis for Appeal: I. CONTEMPT BASED ON UNPROVEN ALLEGATIONS OF COLLUSION The...
  19. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Volt Bank, Inc. v. .AstuteSundew823 [2025] FCR 119

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT Your Honour, The Defendant has been permanently banned. Plaintiff requests default judgment on all prayers for relief.
  20. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Adjourned ToadKing v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] SCR 18

    In my opening statement, I demonstrated that the law governing this case is clear and unambiguous. The Conflict of Interest Standards Act establishes mandatory requirements using mandatory language. The Defence has affirmed every material fact. Judge AmityBlamity provided zero financial...
Back
Top