Search results

  1. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96

    Your Honour, The Plaintiff and Defence have reached a settlement resolving all claims in this matter. The parties request that the Court enforce the following agreed-upon terms, to the best of the Defendant's ability. The Defendant shall pay: $25,000 in Consequential Damages $75,000 in...
  2. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing & Omegabiebel v. 12700k [2025] FCR 129

    @AmityBlamity Your Honour, as the sole FCR Judge able to hear this case following the previous judge's recusal, the Plaintiffs request that this case proceed and that the outstanding Order be ruled upon. Your Honour was on LOA, but has since returned and made their presence known by resuming...
  3. ToadKing

    Appeal: Accepted [2025] FCR 128 - Contempt of Court Charge - Appeal

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT APPELLANT BRIEF Can a Federal Court find a litigant in contempt of court based solely on the judge's subjective feeling of being "pestered" rather than any actual obstruction of justice? The answer must be no. The Federal Court explicitly...
  4. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing & Omegabiebel v. 12700k [2025] FCR 129

    The Plaintiffs submit this response to the Court's Order to Show Cause. I. NO LEGAL BASIS FOR THIS ORDER The Plaintiffs object to the procedural basis of this Order. The Court Rules and Procedures establish the framework for case progression, including Rule 5 (Motion to Dismiss) and Rule 6...
  5. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing & Omegabiebel v. 12700k [2025] FCR 129

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION ToadKing Omegabiebel Plaintiffs v. 12700k Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiffs complain against the Defendants as follows: I. PARTIES 1. ToadKing 2. Omegabiebel 3. 12700k II. FACTS 1. On 3 December 2025, at approximately 12:04...
  6. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank, Inc. v. Alta Group Corporation [2025] FCR 128

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI Both parties have reached an agreement, and Plaintiff requests that this case be dismissed with prejudice.
  7. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECUSE The Plaintiff respectfully moves for the recusal of the presiding Magistrate and requests that this matter be reassigned to an available judicial officer who can promptly adjudicate this case. The presiding Magistrate is on...
  8. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank, Inc. v. Alta Group Corporation [2025] FCR 128

    Your Honour, I would just like to inform the Court that both parties are endeavouring to reach a settlement to resolve this matter swiftly.
  9. ToadKing

    Appeal: Accepted [2025] FCR 128 - Contempt of Court Charge - Appeal

    Username: ToadKing__ I am representing a client Who is your Client?: Omegabiebel File(s) attached What Case are you Appealing?: [2025] FCR 128 - Contempt of Court Charge Link to the Original Case: Lawsuit: Pending - Volt Bank, Inc. v. Alta Group Corporation [2025] FCR 128 Basis for...
  10. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGEMENT Your Honour, The Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court to enter default judgment against the Defendant. This case was filed on 22 November 2025, and this court stated on 27 November 2025 that a Public Defender...
  11. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank, Inc. v. Alta Group Corporation [2025] FCR 128

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honour, Plaintiff respectfully moves this Court to reconsider its Order finding Omegabiebel in Contempt of Court. The contempt finding arose from a single Discord ping notifying the Court and the opposing party of an...
  12. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank, Inc. v. Alta Group Corporation [2025] FCR 128

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION Your Honour, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court issue an emergency injunction and asset freeze to halt the ongoing fraudulent dissipation of collateral and assets by Defendant. Plaintiff has now...
  13. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank, Inc. v. Alta Group Corporation [2025] FCR 128

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Volt Bank, Inc. (represented by ToadKing) Plaintiff v. Alta Group Corporation Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendants as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Volt Bank, Inc. 2. Alta Group Corporation 3. 12700k...
  14. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Volt Bank, Inc. v. Alta Group Corporation [2025] FCR 128

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION Your Honour, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court issue an emergency injunction to halt the ongoing government auction of Plot S105 and prohibit any transfer or sale of said property pending...
  15. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. Anchor Watch [2025] DCR 98

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO NOLLE PROSEQUI The Court's identification of asexualdinosaur as the owner and operator of Anchor Watch has revealed circumstances that extend beyond the scope of this proceeding. The Plaintiff was serving as legal counsel for...
  16. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    I notify the court that I will be withdrawing from this case as the Plaintiff's counsel.
  17. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    Your Honour, Plaintiff responds to the Court's ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE regarding discovery requests. I. FRAMEWORK OF CLAIMS AND DEFENCES To provide context, Plaintiff's claims are: Claim 1: Unfair Dismissal under Section 7(1) of the Commercial Standards Act, specifically Section 7(1)(d) permitting...
  18. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed ToadKing v. Anchor Watch [2025] DCR 98

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION ToadKing Plaintiff v. Anchor News Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendants as follows: I. PARTIES 1. ToadKing 2. Anchor Watch (owner/operator currently unknown to Plaintiff) II. FACTS 1. On or...
  19. ToadKing

    Lawsuit: Dismissed AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

    Pursuant to Rule 4.7 (Request for Discovery, Opposing Party Movement), the Plaintiff requests the Defendant to produce the following materials relevant to the case: 13. Any and all documents or information relating to the purported "classified government plan" known as "slipknot" (D-008)...
Back
Top