Search results

3. You previously confirmed your tenancy on plot wl-f086 on January 19th 2025, who were you renting this plot from at that date?

I hope this is sufficient. If the court was instead looking for different credentials, could the court please clarify what credentials they intended to be displayed?

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - NON-RESPONSIVE This does not answer the question that was asked. The personal relationship between the witness and MrCheesGuy was already asked and answered in the defense's second question. The defense's third question asked...

3. If MrCheesGuy was the one who was renting the plot, what tenancy on the plot did you intend to confirm when answering the Plaintiff's first question?

Good evening, Mr. MeneerLolo. The defense has two questions for you: 1. To clarify, were you the one renting plot wl-f086 on January 19th, 2025? 2. What is your relationship with MrCheesGuy?

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Good afternoon, Your Honor, opposing counsel, citizens of Redmont. May it please the Court, As the Defendant’s Opening Statement is quite unclear on what it is trying to say, much of the work in figuring out what the...

Your Honor, The Plaintiffs respectfully request a 12 hour extension to post their Closing Statement.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT May it please the Court, Your Honor, opposing counsel, citizens of Redmont, this case is an example of the Executive branch failing to follow legislation and harming the very citizens it is meant to serve. The facts of this...

Your Honor, The Plaintiffs request a 24 hour extension to post their Opening Statement due to unforeseen circumstances.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OPENING STATEMENT Your Honor, the Plaintiff’s opening statement was full of claims of alleged misdeeds that the Defendant has allegedly committed. But how many of these alleged misdeeds have any evidence supporting them? The Plaintiff first...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO DISMISS The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges: Rule 5.7 (Failure to Include Party) of our Court Rules and Procedures states that a Motion to Dismiss can be filed...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PLEA The People of the Commonwealth of Redmont through The Department of Justice Prosecution v. Nebrasken64 Defendant I. ENTRY OF PLEA 1. Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY to the two counts of treason. 2. Defendant pleads NOT GUILTY to the two...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE The Prosecution’s case filing does not include agreement to understanding the penalties of lying in the court and the fact that they are subject to perjury should they knowingly make a false statement in court...

RESPONSE TO THE MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your Honor, the Defendant has filed a Motion to Reconsider the court's decision to move for a Summary Judgment, however the Defendant has not brought forward any valid reasoning to do so. The Plaintiffs respectfully request the court to overrule this Motion...

Your Honor, as requested by the court the Defendant will hereby clarify their request. The Defendant did not mean to allege that the court has not been following court procedure, and is aware of Rule 1.2 and the presiding judge's freedom to apply the court rules at their decision. The Defendant...

Your Honor, I will be representing the Defendant in this case from now on. I will be doing so as a Public Defender. The Defendant would like to respectfully request clarification from the court regarding their planned order of events for the court proceedings of this case, as it appears to the...

Your Honor, I will be representing the Defendant in this case as a Public Defender.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL Your Honor, more than 49 hours ago the Plaintiffs have asked an Interrogatory question to the Defendant which is relevant to the case, in line with Rule 4.8 (Interrogatories) of our Court Rules and Procedures. Rule 4.8 states...

Your Honor, Plaintiffs would like to respectfully request a further extension of Discovery per Rule 4.4 of our Court Rules and Procedures. There is a pending motion regarding a Request for Discovery, as well as an interrogatory that is yet to be answered. The Plaintiffs may wish to follow up on...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, Rule 6.3 of our Court Rules and Procedures states: "Objections to questions and arguments are actionable under the methods provided within the thread “Guide” Objection Guide." and the Objection Guide...