INTERROGATORY
1. The Plaintiffs in their first Claim for Relief allege that the Commonwealth conducted an unreasonable seizure against them. Which specific assets of the Plaintiffs do they allege were seized by the Commonwealth?
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CLOSING STATEMENT
Your Honor, the Plaintiff’s claims and reasoning are simply incorrect.
We have gone over the alleged violations of Section 15 of the CSA in our Opening Statement and as neither the witness questioning nor the Plaintiff’s...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO RECONSIDER
Your Honor, while it is true that witness RaiTheGuy did not respond to the questions asked within the timeframe of 48 hours, the Defendant would like to remind the Court of the fact that there was a pending Objection filed...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO OBJECTION
Your Honor, an Objection - Assumes Facts Not In Evidence is for those cases where "a question presumes something as true that has not been established by evidence." The questions to which the Plaintiff is objecting are...
@MasterAshim
2. Did you DM BigPappa140: "would you reccomend me to buy the fiflty reich mystery box? "
3. Did BigPappa140 respond to the DM mentioned in question 2 with: "Can't answer that" "Not getting attacked by the doc for a mystery box" "Lmao"
4. Did you, following the DMs referenced in...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE
Your Honor, the Court already stated that they would rule on the motion after the 48 hours had passed. The Plaintiff bringing their motion up once again is wholly unnecessary. The Plaintiff has spoken out of...
@MasterAshim
1. When bidding on the mystery box, were you aware that the value the items inside would have to you could be less than 50k?
@Bardiya_King
1. Were you a DOC employee at the time of the "Filthy Rich Mystery Box" auction?
2. Is the screenshot D-001 a screenshot from a DOC ticket...
Your Honor, the Defense is aware that the 72-hour period has already elapsed, and that they did not request an extension in time. However, considering that the Defendant has not requested any extensions previously in this case and that the deadline passed recently enough that the Court has not...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
MOTION TO DISMISS
The defence moves that the complaint in this case be dismissed, and in support thereof, respectfully alleges:
1. The first claim for relief made by the Plaintiff is that the Defendant caused the Plaintiff to be belittled...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
Ethamn
Plaintiff
v.
Faldorix
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The defence DENIES that the Plaintiff was first murdered by the Defendant when attempting to leave spawn.
2. The defence DENIES that this was brought to...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
RESPONSE TO OBJECTION - PERJURY
Both the Complaint and the Answer to the Complaint agree that the Defendant has at one point in time stated that mystery boxes are a form of gambling. This is what is said in Fact #5 of the Answer, which the...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
OPENING STATEMENT
May it please the Court,
Your Honor, opposing counsel, citizens of Redmont, the claims made by the Plaintiff are incorrect and today we will go over why this is the case.
On the first claim for relief
The plaintiff claims...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
RealImza
Plaintiff
v.
adonimous_blueYT (Formerly StaleUmbrella80)
Defendant
I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT
1. The Defence DENIES that the Defendant committed attempted murder and murder against the plaintiff on the 16th and...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CLOSING STATEMENT
Your Honor, as the Defendant explained in-depth in their Opening Statement, the Plaintiff simply has not brought forward any evidence for the wild claims that they are making in this case. Their closing statement does not...
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
CIVIL ACTION
winterwolf (represented by Dragon Law)
Plaintiff
v.
The Commonwealth of Redmont
Defendant
COMPLAINT
The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows:
On the 8th of February 2025 winterwolf declared that they would be...
Your Honor, the Plaintiff's first question " Can you confirm your tenancy on the willow plot wl-f086 on January 19th, 2025?" was answered by the witness with "Yes i can". The statement that the witness previously confirmed their tenancy on plot wl-f086 on January 19th 2025 is therefore correct.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.