Search results

Overruled. A part of Plaintiff's responsibility in proving the Commonwealth's liability in the corruption claim is to demonstrate that the government officer's acts were corrupt. Regardless, the Court will provide an early warning to Plaintiff to not venture from their claims against the...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76 ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS I. SETTLEMENT It is not correct to say that, since a settlement offer has been made, Plaintiff no longer has standing. Though the offer does aim to provide...

Noting Plaintiff's remarks, the Court grants the motion to compel. Sustained. The procedural issue goes a bit back. Requests to compel should be made in motions. If the original request was made in a motion to compel, Plaintiff would have provided a response, then the Court would have asked...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76 ORDER FOR THE COMMONWEALTH TO PROVIDE PROPER REPRESENTATION An issue that came before the Court is whether the Secretary of Department of Construction and Transportation Secretary, End, has...

Permission granted. You have 24 hours. Overruled, given that the motion was amended to address the issues. Likewise, you will have 24 hours to respond. Granted. The objection of the amendment to the Complaint and a ruling on the issue of representation have not been unnoticed but are still...

Granted.

The Motion to Extend Discovery is granted. The new deadline for Discovery is set to end an additional 48 hours after the previous deadline. As Discovery progresses, additional time may be requested. You may do so. You have 36 hours. If you need more time, please request an extension. The...

Discovery shall now begin and will be originally set to end 72 hours from the time of this post. Extensions may be requested before the deadline, and upon agreement of both parties, Discovery can be ended early.

The Court understands the situation with plot r054 and agrees with the choice to not reacquire it. The request to return the remaining plots back to Plaintiff is granted.

Granted.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT YourLocalDiabeto v jb4bass [2025] FCR 79 ORDER SUA SPONTE DISMISSING CASE FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION The Constitution § 18(1) enumerates the types of cases the Federal Court has original jurisdiction over, "(a) Questions of constitutionality...

It is recognized that Defendant has been permanently deported and therefore does not enjoy a right to representation. See UnityMaster v. lcn [2025] SCR 2. From here on, Defendant will not partake in the case, but the arguments made prior to the deportation will still be considered since they...

I will take this to mean that you are being hired by the DOJ as a prosecutor. You may represent the Commonwealth on the condition that you're hired as a prosecutor in the next 72 hours. If you are not hired by then, you will no longer be allowed to represent the Commonwealth. You have 48 hours...

@End, the objection raises significant concerns whether there is legal authority for what the executive branch is attempting to do in these two cases. Though the Court understands the situation the Commonwealth is currently in, this situation is not a reason to act in ways contrary to law. To...

I'll be the new presiding judge. The Court will remain in recess while getting up to date with the case.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Lex Titanum v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 72 SUA SPONTE DISMISSING FOR LACK OF VALID CLAIM I. CONSTITUTION § 32(9) The Constitution § 32(9) reads, “Any citizen, criminal or otherwise will have the right to a speedy and fair trial...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Lex Titanum v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 72 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Court is considering sua sponte dismissing this case pursuant to Court Rules and Procedures Rule 2.2, for failing to state a valid claim, given that the Constitution...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Privacy Matters v. Nexalin [2025] FCR 36 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT Since Defendant failed to amend their Answer to Complaint and demonstrated a lack of interest in pursuing this case, the Motion for Default Judgment is granted...

The Attorney General, @gribble19, is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EMERGENCY...

Defendant has 72 hours from the time of this post to file an Opening Statement.