Search results

  1. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Construction & Transportation [2025] FCR 112

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT This closing addresses a pattern of selective non-enforcement by the Department of Construction and Transportation which goes beyond mere administrative error. Through a series of illustrative plots, it becomes clear that the...
  2. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT Your Honour, and may it please the Court. I appear before Your Honour today to show that the Plaintiff committed no trespass. I will first address the questions of law; next, demonstrate the Plaintiff’s innocence; then...
  3. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION: BREACH OF PROCEDURE The 49 purported ‘follow‑up questions’ for GoldenDude15 posted at #81 are not genuine follow‑ups (as would be permitted by Your Honour at #78) and are therefore in breach of the procedural rules imposed by Your...
  4. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    ANSWERS TO CROSS-EXAMINATION QUESTIONS (jsrkiwi) 1. That is correct. 2. That is correct. 3. I am a Police Officer and a Detective. 3.1. That is correct. 3.2. I understand that some people might assert that position, yes. 4. That is correct. 4.1. That is correct. 4.2. That is correct. 4.3. That...
  5. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    ANSWERS TO WITNESS QUESTIONS (jsrkiwi) 1. When the log says “Teleporting to vernicia”, where exactly does that warp drop you? This home-warp was located within plot c995, underground. The approximate coordinates are 4141, -40, 4095. 2. When you use the ‘vernicia’ warp, what do you see...
  6. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Construction & Transportation [2025] FCR 112

    ANSWERS TO WITNESS QUESTIONS (jsrkiwi) 1. What jobs do you hold? Miner, Farmer, Realtor, Police Officer, Detective, Trainee Doctor, Economist 2. Have you visited the Redmont Art Gallery? Yes, on 21st October 2025. a. What, if anything, did you observe about the interior of the property? There...
  7. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Construction & Transportation [2025] FCR 112

    The DOC does not track the kind of information these questions ask about. Economists within DOC do not do anything relating to inactive private plots or real-estate supply. What economists do is prepare CPI figures; process billboard requests; and assess the economic impact of grant applications.
  8. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Construction & Transportation [2025] FCR 112

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO INCOMPETENCE OBJECTION Your Honour, the objection is unfounded. The Witness is employed as an Economist at the Department of Commerce. Questions 5, 6, and 7 concern basic economic principles relating to restricted...
  9. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Construction & Transportation [2025] FCR 112

    Apologies for the untimeliness in filing witness questions Your Honour; the Plaintiff’s questions for all witnesses are listed below. Follow-up questions have been indented and ordered with letters. Please note, questions about economic harm addressed to jsrkiwi lie within his competence, as...
  10. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO WITNESS QUESTIONS Your Honour, I’ve included the Defendant’s objections in quotation boxes throughout for clarity. Many of the objections are repetitive, so the Plaintiff addresses them in groups where relevant, for efficiency. To save the...
  11. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PLAINTIFF’S CONSOLIDATED LIST OF WITNESS QUESTIONS Your Honour, the Plaintiff’s consolidated list of witness questions is laid out below. Witness 1: jsrkiwi, Plaintiff Questions re logs, sales, and travel Questions 1-18 relate to the...
  12. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Construction & Transportation [2025] FCR 112

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT jsrkiwi v Department of Construction & Transportation [2025] FCR 112 OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour, and may it please the court. This case is deeply about fairness, market integrity, and equal enforcement. The evidence will show that DCT...
  13. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    The Plaintiff apologises to Your Honour and this Honourable Court for the delay in filing this opening statement. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93 OPENING STATEMENT Your Honour, and may it please the court. This...
  14. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S RULE 5.5 MOTION Your Honour, The Defence incorrectly reframes the third claim for relief as a simple evidentiary dispute about when a book was updated. That is not what the claim is about. The claim is part of a broader allegation that the Department of...
  15. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION (#42) Your Honour, Exhibit P-201 is directly tied to the Plaintiff’s planned questioning of Vernicia. It includes her sworn testimony regarding the context of Exhibit P-111. It is required to prevent Vernicia from giving misleading context...
  16. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    RULE 4.6 EVIDENCE SUBMISSION This might be improper, since these documents are already preserved on the forum. However, to ensure that the record is complete, the Plaintiff enters the following into evidence under Rule 4.6: P-201: Testimony by Vernicia in the case jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar...
  17. J

    Lawsuit: Dismissed jsrkiwi v Trentrick_Lamar [2025] DCR 90

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR NOLLE PROSEQUI The Plaintiff, in light of Your Honour’s ruling on the Defendant’s Rule 5.5 motion, and recognising that the matter cannot be successfully pursued further, respectfully moves that the Court discontinue the...
  18. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENCE’S INTERROGATORIES 1. Have you ever entered the property C995 other than by warping to a /home? Yes. 2. Have you ever entered the property c108 other than by warping to a /home? Yes. 3. What does the Plaintiff understand “read before entry” to mean, as shown in...
  19. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    RULE 4.6 EVIDENCE SUBMISSION Persuant to rule 4.6, the Plaintiff enters the following into evidence: P-111: The entirety of all Discord direct messages between Vernicia and jsrkiwi as of 21st November 2025.
  20. J

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    PLAINTIFF'S WITNESS LIST The Plaintiff will not be adding any additional witnesses at this time. The witness list, therefore, remains as originally filed: jsrkiwi Vernicia Goldendude15 Roryyy_
Back
Top