Search results

@ko531 @juniperfig IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS Before the Court is a Motion to Stay Proceedings made by Plaintiff, requesting to stay these proceedings until the conclusion of Commonwealth of Redmont v. AsexualDinosaur [2025] FCR 127. In...

DENIED. The standards of evidence in a civil case, such as the one before the Court, differ substantially from those in a criminal proceeding. The Court has not ruled that it is proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the Plaintiff operates, manages, and/or controls Anchor Watch News. Rather, the...

OVERRULED. The Plaintiff did not present a materially false fact here, they presented their legal opinion. The Plaintiff and their counsel are entitled to make legal arguments as they see fit, even if they are wrong, without fear of perjuring themselves.

SUSTAINED, per the request of Plaintiff's counsel. The Court notes that, in general, it will not permit extensive or unfocused public inquiry into the conduct of other DOJ employees, as such inquiry is unduly burdensome and infringes upon the privacy rights of the employees involved. The...

SUSTAINED. Although the Plaintiff is entitled to invoke his Fifth Charter Right, this is a civil proceeding, and the Court is permitted to draw an adverse inference from his refusal to clarify his involvement with Anchor Watch News. Accordingly, for the purposes of this case, the Court finds it...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO STAY PROCEEDINGS GRANTED. This case is STAYED until Plaintiff's new counsel enters an appearance or until 1 December 2025 at 02:00 UTC, whichever occurs first. The stay will lift automatically when either condition is met. Upon the...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Court, based on the submissions by the Commonwealth, considers it extremely unlikely that Plaintiff does not directly or indirectly operate, manage or control Anchor Watch. At the very least, Plaintiff had some...

I'll take that as a no. Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, this matter is DISMISSED without prejudice.

These comments are stricken as they were made out of turn. However, now that you are here, do you wish to be heard on the Court's findings or the Plaintiff's Motion to Nolle Prosequi?

The Commonwealth has 48 hours to respond to Plaintiff's Response to the Order to Show Cause and to make any Objections it wishes against the Plaintiff's Discovery Requests. @juniperfig

Thank you. Do you wish to amend your previous counsel's Discovery Requests or his Response to the Order to Show Cause?

@asexualdinosaur is required to appear before the District Court in the case of AsexualDinosaur v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] DCR 95

The Court, having requested Order 2 of the above Court Order be actioned by the Staff Team, enters the following documents received into the record. Accordingly, the Court identifies the Owner/Operator of "Anchor Watch" to be @asexualdinosaur. Magistrate Venne.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO PRODUCE OWNERSHIP RECORDS Before the Court is a Motion to Compel filed by the Plaintiff in this case requesting an order to compel the disclosure of the identity of the owner, operator, and/or author of the news organisation known as...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE The Court has conducted sua sponte review of Plaintiff's discovery requests and finds that several of the demands appear facially overbroad and disproportionate in the light of the instant litigation. The Court intends to...

We will now enter Discovery, which shall last 5 days. Discovery may be ended early if both Parties agree. @ToadKing @juniperfig

SUSTAINED. Please note that the Commonwealth only requested that the bolded sections be struck. Those sections have been demonstrated to be false, given Plaintiff was given the opportunity to respond to allegations regarding their involvement in Anchor Watch News. Furthermore, an objection for...

OVERRULED. Given that this additional Contempt Charge occurred in Plaintiff's private practice, I am inclined to give the Plaintiff some creative liberty in his argument here. The Commonwealth has included evidence of this Contempt Charge in Plaintiff's private practice in their Answer, so I can...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT PARTIAL DISMISSAL Before the Court is a Motion to Dismiss filed by the Commonwealth on 26 November 2025. Upon review of the pleadings and record, consideration of the applicable law, and being fully advised, the Court issues the following...

Thank you! You have 48 hours to present an Answer to Complaint.