Search results

Oh yeah Your Honor. Mmiqa in fact uses chatgpt. He even uses the signature chatgpt — all the time.

Yeah, we got it after I retracted my objection.

Let me give some additional testimony, Mmiqa is a temu chatGPT lawyer who deserves disbarment. Sue me lol.

Your Honor I retract my objection as I've been made aware that the BAR themself might be handling this case instead of the Department of Justice.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, acknowledging that the Commonwealth has not been summoned for this matter, I'd like to point out the blatant violation of procedure here, court rule 3.3 states "... Amendments to the complaint must be...

4. To my knowledge there is no such thing as §6(b) of the Criminal Code Act. 6. Again, § 6(b) of the Criminal Code Act does not exist to my knowledge. 7. Sorry, but the statement in this question is simply untrue, I told him I needed proof before accepting the dispute, I never said anything...

Your Honor, how long do I have to answer?

This would be my new closing statement. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT This case rests on a question of legal interpretation: whether Part I §6(10) of the Criminal Code Act permits an individual to claim self-defense when the criminal action being...

Your Honor, I mistakenly thought this was a Federal Case. Permission to amend closing statement to reflect District instead of Federal court?

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CLOSING STATEMENT This case rests on a question of legal interpretation: whether Part I §6(10) of the Criminal Code Act permits an individual to claim self-defense when the criminal action being defended against is directed at another...

Your Honor, I'm deeply sorry for pissing the deadline on this. I got the deadline of this case mixed up with another case. I am fully aware that the court may deny to let the Commonwealth post its closing statement. Regardless, I'm requesting a post-hoc extension for this deadline.

It has been nearly a month since this message. The Commonwealth respectfully inquires if this might be because of the former presiding judge of this case resigning, and if the process of finding a public defender is still ongoing.

Would it help if I identified the provision stating that the DHS can accept the dispute after evidence has been provided. (This is different from what the Plaintiff was asking, but it's the closest thing I can think of that I can do).

Your Honor, are you requiring me to respond to question 2 as you sustained a non-responsive objection?

Response to objection I never states that I didn't say what the Plaintiff cited. I did in fact state "Hello, in order to accept your dispute, I'll need some proof of this being self defense." But as I said before, the Plaintiff is just completely twisting my statement. The Plaintiff claims that...

Your Honor, respectfully, the reason I could not identify a provision that allowed me to make that statement that the Plaintiff claims, is because I never made that statement.

Answer to question 2 As I said. I never imposed the condition that the dispute must be accepted in order for the Plaintiff to be released. I said that I needed proof in order to accept the dispute, I never linked the acceptance of the dispute to the release of the Plaintiff. Thus, I cannot...

The Commonwealth has no issue with this. I'd like to clarify that my question was just an inquiry and I did not mean any disrespect to Your Honor or the Court.

Your Honor, is there a particular reason for skipping opening statements?

I unfortunately cannot continue to represent the Defendant in this case.