Search results

The court is considering judgement as a matter of law. Until then, the further progression of the case is stayed.

Denied. Defendant's motion violates Rule 9.2 as it does not specify the judgment sought and the law and facts that entitle the movant to the judgment. The Court believes that the Defendant may have confused the motion with a motion for summary judgement.

You may file a motion for judgement as a matter of law. Should you choose to do so, please show cause why we should not proceed into an inquest proceeding in your motion.

@DaanBanaan5673 please now move forward to cross-examination.

@SplashyAlpaca77 please rephrase your answer.

The out-of-turn statement is struck. You are an Attorney, you know better than this. Should you wish to submit defences, follow the correct procedure.

You are hereby held in contempt of court again for your repeated out-of-turn statements. As it appears obvious to the Court that Defendant acted with the intent to blatantly disrespect the Court, they shall be fined $12,000 and be imprisioned for 10 minutes. The out-of-turn statement is struck.

@DaanBanaan5673 are we ready to move forward to cross-examination?

Please be more timely and request extensions if necessary counsellor. The questions were filed ~5 hours late.

The Court, reviewing this answer sua sponte, finds it non-responsive. The question called for the interest rate of the intended loan, the method of interest (simple or compound) and the applicable interest interval. Your response, "Complex Interest", is an at best ambigous answer to one of the...

@SplashyAlpaca77 please respond to question 5 in a more responsive manner, as ordered by the Court (#45).

Should the Defence wish, they may now conduct cross-examination of said witnesses again. Please inform the Court of your decision as soon as possible. @DaanBanaan5673

The Defence shall submit an answer to the complaint within 72 hours.

The Court will partially grant this motion to reconsider. To preserve a fair trial, the defence will be afforded an opportunity to respond to any new matters raised by the Plaintiff's examination with a renewed cross-examination of their own. The Court declines to strike said questions by the...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Writ of Summons @Technofied is hereby commanded to appear as a witness before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. wttn2c [2026] DCR 75. Failure to appear within 72 hours of this summons will result in a contempt of...

I sincerely apologise, I appear to have missed the filing of the witness list by the Defence. The issue will be rectified posthaste. My above order (#38) is amended to state "Both parties shall post their initial questions to the witnesses within 48 hours of the latter one announcing their...

Apologies for the confusion. As the District Court does not have any specific rules for witness testimony, we will be observing the Regulations of the Federal Court in regards to witness testimony only.

We shall now move to witness testimony. The Court will summon all applicable witnesses. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Writ of Summons @Vennefly is hereby commanded to appear as a witness before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. wttn2c [2026] DCR...

Sustained. The witness is ordered to answer the question in full. Overruled. In the interest of making the most informed decision possible, the Court will grant Plaintiff a post-hoc extension and permit them to ask their questions. The witnesses shall respond to the present questions within 48...

As this concludes the answering of Defendant's questions, Defendant shall now have 24 hours to submit follow-up questions, or decline to submit such. @DaanBanaan5673