Search results

The defense has 24 hours to cross examine the witnesses and ask their questions

@gribble19 is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of T04ds74 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 65

@Gregg is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. Gregg [2025] FCR 64

Denied. A public defender should be appointed shortly

Objection - Nothing Pending Sustained. The comment is struck Objection - Perjury Sustained in part, the Evidence may not show how long the plaintiff worked in the mine but it does show that more then half of the sentence was actually skipped and not served. Even though the fact of how much time...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Commonwealth of Redmont v. mc20masarati [2025] FCR 57 I. PROSECUTION'S POSITION 1. The defendant committed legal fraud by practicing law without any legal qualifications in fluffywaafelz v. undatheradar [2025] FCR 54 2. The defendant...

Granted Granted. Court is in recess pending verdict.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT zLost v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 52 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The plaintiff wishes the Federal court determine whether Oakridge election data is justly classified as allowed by the Classification Act. 2. If the Oakridge...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT Vernicia v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 51 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. Due to the plaintiff owning a volt bank account the DOC's imposed bank holiday violates the plaintiffs 15th right for being an unreasonable seizure of assets...

I am dismissing this case Sua Sponte under rule 2.1 for lack of standing. Standing requires three elements and this case has a glaring hole with the second requirement "The cause of injury was against the law." By the plaintiff's own facts, the comment in which caused the alleged damages was...

Granted

Does the plaintiff have any follow up questions?

I am denying this motion in part. This case is being moved to the Supreme Court as I do not have the authority or power to rule and decide cases involving the removal or banning of office. This case however is not being dismissed and only moved to the SC as to not waste this trial. I see no...

The defense has 72 hours to provide their closing statement

You may

@DocsTheory You have 24 hours to respond to these questions or you will be held in contempt.

As no witnesses were called, we will be moving to closing statements. The Plaintiff has 72 hours to provide their closing statements

This case is being dismissed Sua Sponte for lack of a clear second party under Court rule 2.1 The court has come to the understanding when in search of a second party to summon (something that isn't the court's responsiblity to do), that the plaintiff, Cope Holdings, purchased Vanguard Martket...

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT VERDICT End v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 31 I. PLAINTIFF'S POSITION 1. The Executive has failed in it's duties and Judicial intervention is required. 2. JSAA should be law as the president failed to give assent or veto in the required...

Mc20Masarati is hereby charged with contempt of court. Please for the future, if you are going to call me shit, spell it correctly, thank you.