Search results

  1. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT CONTEMPT OF COURT I. First Contempt of Court Defendant, In his Closing Statements, Objects that the Plaintiff's closing statements were "riddled with errors" (seem below) and argues that the document was made it AI. In his Defense, Counselor says that he wrote...
  2. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE While reviewing this docket, this Court found that Counselor Y8l did not abide by this Court's orders and procedures during this case. During Pré-Trial, in Post #16 and Post #29 Counselor breached Court Rules and Procedure. He was warned that...
  3. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    @Y8l You have 48 hours to respond to the aforementioned paragraph
  4. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    This Court will treat the paragraph "What in the ChatGPT-5.6 Sol? Plaintiff’s closing is riddled with errors" as a breach of procedure and perjury objection. Court is in recess pending a verdict. This may take some time, as I'm buried on university classes and I want to review every precedent...
  5. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session Slime_Mario v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] DCR 166

    @Nacho @Superwoops or any other delegated Prosecutor shall provide an closing statement within 72 hours.
  6. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    @jsrkiwi @EmeraldGuuy The defendant has 72 hours to provide an closing statement.
  7. Poker

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Megamango800 vs. JackalGG [2026] DCR 164

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT VERDICT - Megamango800 vs. JackalGG [2026] DCR 164 I. BACKGROUND On August 8, 2026, the Defendant offered an elytra for $2,000, which the Plaintiff agreed to purchase. After receiving the payment, the Defendant failed to deliver the item or refund the money...
  8. Poker

    Lawsuit: Pending zPokebr_ v. ZapperyDoo [2026] DCR 113

    I'll handle this case myself, your honor. I'm sorry for the confusion. The law firm I've prospected showed extreme incompetence and lack of professionalism during private conversation, and I cannot find any other. Plaintiff request 1) To refile the Complaint, so I can edit it during the...
  9. Poker

    Lawsuit: Pending zPokebr_ v. ZapperyDoo [2026] DCR 113

    Your Honor, i've hired a new Counsel. He will soon appear in this Court. Im extremely grateful for the extension. Plaintiff wishes to respond to the motion to strike (post #20).
  10. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session Slime_Mario v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] DCR 166

    If we are done with interrogatories, @Slime_Mario You shall present an closing statement within 72 hours.
  11. Poker

    Lawsuit: Pending zPokebr_ v. ZapperyDoo [2026] DCR 113

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, CreeperTD breached the standards of decorum and respect owed to the opposing party under Rule 1.4.3.1. My Breach of Procedure Objection wasn't on baid faith, unsavory and/or to gain personal advantage. Those are...
  12. Poker

    Lawsuit: Pending zPokebr_ v. ZapperyDoo [2026] DCR 113

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your Honor, CreeperTD have communicated with you on a non court-sanctioned forum (P-005). Court-sanctioned forum should be a venue authorized by this Court to solve the dispute, instead he posted such warning/request on the...
  13. Poker

    Lawsuit: Pending zPokebr_ v. ZapperyDoo [2026] DCR 113

    Yes, i do wish to continue. However, I will no longer be represented by SHAA, as the firm has "disbanded", closed communications and leave me without notice. I respectfully request 48 hours to retain a new counsel.
  14. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session Slime_Mario v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] DCR 166

    I find pepper5980 in Contempt of Court, as in CCA, for failing to obey a lawful order of the Court. He shall be fined 5 PUs. The Department of Justice is ordered to continue this lawsuit within 48 hours (@Nacho). Adverse inferences may be drawn in omission. Any question non objected shall be...
  15. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    Overruled. This answer did address Q6, since the witness said what roy405 told them and what they recall. The extra sentences are not non-responsive, at most they are irrelevant. I remind both parties of Rule 4.2. This Court will not rely on D-001/D-002 and the witness’s [hearsay] argument on...
  16. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session Slime_Mario v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2026] DCR 166

    Discovery has ended. @pepper5980 you have further 24 hours to address post #19 under pain of contempt of court
  17. Poker

    Lawsuit: Pending Bob596 v. NiceGuysNice [2026] DCR 120

    Court in recess pending a verdict
  18. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    @frodo1005 you shall respond to the questions present in Post #122 within 36 hours.
  19. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    To save the parties time, the Court update the question list and submits below. Post #116 is struck. @jsrkiwi let me know if there is any problem. 1. During the crossbow test you described under direct examination, did any of roy405's shots cause you to lose health? 2. Before the shots were...
Back
Top