Your Honor, I am in the process of finding a new lawyer, as I would not like to pursue this case myself. However, I respectfully ask for the opportunity to submit two separate responses to the Perjury Objection: one for me and one for my former counsel, if he wishes so.
I believe it would be...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - DEFAMATION
In Boykisse v. Musclebound [2026] DCR 19 - Appeal | [2026] FCR 11, the Federal Court stated: "Without proof of pecuniary damages, or any theory of damage that doesn’t rely on hypothesis, borne from the allegedly defamatory...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Order to Compel
On motion from Plaintiff, and in probable cause of Misleading Conduct in Trade or Commerce and Failure to Deliver Goods or Services, the Court orders the Staff Team (@staff) the production of logs as following
1) Chat Logs...
Do the Plaintiff have more evidence? I need it, this is a shortened modified civil procedure, not a Default on Failure to Defense Judgement.
I need it especially for facts 1,2 and 7. I remind you that you can move this court for a warrant compelling the staff team to produce chat logs and drop...
I guess Plaintiff @Y8l won't concur to end Early Discovery. So, please be aware of court rules and procedures. You can also Motion to Reconsider the sua sponte dismissal if you wish, but as i said i don't see pecuniary loss from the facts, claim and from you own answer until now.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
SUA SPONTE DISMISSAL OF PRAYER
According to RCCA, Compensatory damages will not be awarded without proof of pecuniary loss, including compensation for harm to property, harm to earning capacity, and the creation of liabilities; unless they are special damage...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
1) Defamation
I can't see how the statement injured the Plaintiff's reputation, or how it actually caused any harm to it. Either develop further on the alleged harm to the Plaintiff's reputation or provide evidence supporting it.
In Boykisse...
@CreeperTD, as the Plaintiff has updated his Complaint, you have 48 hours to object to it, or/and file a motion against it, or/and submit an Answer to Complaint.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
Order On Reconsideration for Defendant Motion
GRANTED
On reconsideration, this court finds that Rule 3.1 is obligatory to any one filling a Complaint. The language has been changed from 'shall' to 'must' within Court Rules and Procedures exactly to create a...
In line with Rule 3.6.2, the court requires Plaintiff to develop and argue the case prior to adjudication.
The vacate deadline is 12/September/26 at 16:13 UTC.
Discovery shall last until 08/September/26 at 16:13 UTC. If discovery is not required, Plaintiff may proceed to phase (b) of the...
This court will proceed into sua sponte inquest as per rule 3.6.1. Are you representing yourself? or are you delegating this case to another lawyer? you have 72 hours to assign someone (or yourself, as you're a barrister).
Do the plaintiffs still have interest in pursuing this case? please, respond within 48 hours @Sujal1048 Otherwise, this case will be dismissed without prejudice.
Do the plaintiff still have interest in pursuing this case? please, respond within 48 hours @exclusiv3z Otherwise, this case will be dismissed without prejudice.
Edit: Double checking the case, I recuse from this case due to be the one who made the eviction report. disregard this message.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.