Search results

  1. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    a mail regarding this summons was sent to .august4496
  2. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    @frodo1005 and @.august4496 are required to appear before the District Court as witnesses in the case of The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154
  3. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    Motion DENIED I. Counselor, your Answer to complaint states "Fact 6 is not applicable to Co-Defendant roy405". Pursuant to Rule 4.1, 3.6, 3.2.1 and 3.4.3, this will be considered as non contested. II. Under JSA, Part III, 2(1)(a), the litigant is required to prove his case under a balance of...
  4. Poker

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Megamango800 vs. JackalGG [2026] DCR 164

    Discovery is open for 5 days
  5. Poker

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Megamango800 vs. JackalGG [2026] DCR 164

    Counselor, you do not contest fact 3 in your Answer, but you say that the Defendant offered the elytra for $2,800 in your Defense. Can i get an explication, please? you have 48 hours
  6. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS I. Background Plaintiff comes to this Court and accuses Defendant PhatCat2200 of libel. In his arguments, Counselor X8l_ argued PhatCat2200, af made an advertisement calling the plaintiff a scammer after the plaintiff posted another...
  7. Poker

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Megamango800 vs. JackalGG [2026] DCR 164

    Defendant is warned that further misconduct will lead to Contempt of Court charges Post #29 and #30 will be stricked
  8. Poker

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Sujal1048J v. YoroZy [2026] DCR 89

    Court pending a verdict
  9. Poker

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Sujal1048J v. YoroZy [2026] DCR 89

    Respectively, STAFF-001 and STAFF-002
  10. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    @Y8l you have 48 hours to respond to this motion Granted Overruled. I agree this is a straightforward request, however, Plaintiff has the burden of proof. If he made misleading arguments, he shall be punished accordingly. Further, i need time to write all the rulings.
  11. Poker

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Gavy v. Rafa_LIT4 [2026] DCR 157

    Please, amend your Complaint to include the claims and reliefs you are searching under this civil tort. After that, summons will be issued
  12. Poker

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Gavy v. Rafa_LIT4 [2026] DCR 157

    Thank you, Counselor. I understand both points, but I still need to know what reputational damage your client has suffered. Under Rule 2.1, a plaintiff must establish an injury caused by an identifiable second party in order to bring a claim and that injury has to be against the law. In a...
  13. Poker

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Megamango800 vs. JackalGG [2026] DCR 164

    Thank you, please, provide a Answer to Complaint within 48 hours.
  14. Poker

    Lawsuit: Adjourned MrTheTanTan v. jamie4432 [2026] DCR 162

    C-002, C-003, C-004. Verdict is amended.
  15. Poker

    Lawsuit: In Session The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154

    Can i have the source to this 'rumor shield' theory/precedent? Please, hyperlink your citations... you have 24 hours.
  16. Poker

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Megamango800 vs. JackalGG [2026] DCR 164

    A public defender will be assigned.
  17. Poker

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Megamango800 vs. JackalGG [2026] DCR 164

    I find JackalGG GUILTY for Contempt of Court for obstructing the Administration of Justice as in CCA. He shall be fined 5 penalty units for each unsolicited and out-of-turn message, for a total of 55 penalty units. These fines shall only be collected upon the issuance of a money judgment in...
  18. Poker

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Megamango800 vs. JackalGG [2026] DCR 164

    Can you explain (and prove, where possible) why you can't get a private lawyer?
  19. Poker

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Megamango800 vs. JackalGG [2026] DCR 164

    @Carrottt_ @MegaMango800 Does the Plaintiff concur?
Back
Top