@frodo1005 and @.august4496 are required to appear before the District Court as witnesses in the case of The Forge v. roy405 and PhatCat2200 [2026] DCR 154
Motion DENIED
I. Counselor, your Answer to complaint states "Fact 6 is not applicable to Co-Defendant roy405". Pursuant to Rule 4.1, 3.6, 3.2.1 and 3.4.3, this will be considered as non contested.
II. Under JSA, Part III, 2(1)(a), the litigant is required to prove his case under a balance of...
Counselor, you do not contest fact 3 in your Answer, but you say that the Defendant offered the elytra for $2,800 in your Defense. Can i get an explication, please? you have 48 hours
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF REDMONT
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
I. Background
Plaintiff comes to this Court and accuses Defendant PhatCat2200 of libel. In his arguments, Counselor X8l_ argued PhatCat2200, af made an advertisement calling the plaintiff a scammer after the plaintiff posted another...
@Y8l you have 48 hours to respond to this motion
Granted
Overruled. I agree this is a straightforward request, however, Plaintiff has the burden of proof. If he made misleading arguments, he shall be punished accordingly. Further, i need time to write all the rulings.
Thank you, Counselor. I understand both points, but I still need to know what reputational damage your client has suffered.
Under Rule 2.1, a plaintiff must establish an injury caused by an identifiable second party in order to bring a claim and that injury has to be against the law. In a...
I find JackalGG GUILTY for Contempt of Court for obstructing the Administration of Justice as in CCA.
He shall be fined 5 penalty units for each unsolicited and out-of-turn message, for a total of 55 penalty units. These fines shall only be collected upon the issuance of a money judgment in...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.