Search results

  1. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT RESPONSE TO OBJECTION The defendant failed to send any funds, but the Defense’s argument is that the Plaintiff is not owed the funds as the aforementioned contract is invalid due to the reasons provided. Opposing counsel may disagree...
  2. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. ImzaKRD [2025] SCR 20

    Thank you, your honour. We would like the Court to disregard the revision request filed here:
  3. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT OakRidge Community Bank Plaintiff v. XinmjirGamingHQ Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. AFFIRMS that on 11/3/2025 the defendant opened a banking and loan inquiry ticket in the OakRidge Community Bank discord server. 2...
  4. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    The Defense has no objection to the injunction insofar as my client does not come back to DC during the course of this case or wishes to use the funds.
  5. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Superwoops v. Red Nose Capital [2025] FCR 136

    Your honour, I have made the changes. Additionally, I ask that the following injunction Lawsuit: Pending - Volt Bank, Inc. v. Sagamo2008 [2025] FCR 135 is extended until the conclusion of the case that goes on the longest. If Sagamo2008 is found to be liable in both cases, we recommend an...
  6. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Superwoops v. Red Nose Capital [2025] FCR 136

    Your honour, may I amend my filing to reflect this?
  7. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Superwoops v. Red Nose Capital [2025] FCR 136

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR EMERGENCY INJUNCTION Your honour, The Plaintiff is aware of the current injunction on Sagamo2008's assets in Lawsuit: Pending - Volt Bank, Inc. v. Sagamo2008 [2025] FCR 135. However, I ask the court to treat Sagamo2008's assets...
  8. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Superwoops v. Red Nose Capital [2025] FCR 136

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CIVIL ACTION Superwoops Plaintiff v. Red Nose Capital Defendant COMPLAINT The Plaintiff complains against the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Superwoops (Plaintiff) 2. Red Nose Capital (Defendant) 3. Sagamo2008 (CEO and owner of the...
  9. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE This attorney has already been given contempt twice, I ask he is charged with contempt again and/or served a conduct strike for not following court rules of procedure and disrupting proceedings repeatedly and...
  10. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - PERJURY I am attaching two pieces of evidence from different AI detecting websites, both of which affirming that a majority of the contract submitted in P-01 was AI-generated. (62% and 77%). If a contract was mostly written by...
  11. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT OBJECTION - BREACH OF PROCEDURE Your honour, Plaintiff's counsel has now three times attempted to pierce my client's right to representation under §IV(32)9 of the Constitution. My client is not subject to waive of representation under public...
  12. S

    Lawsuit: Adjourned OakRidge Community Bank v. XinmjirGamingHQ [2025] DCR 106

    I am present as the assigned Public Defender.
  13. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. ImzaKRD [2025] SCR 20

    Your honour, The Prosecution respectfully requests this Court to revise the previous ruling striking facts 10 and 11. In Lawsuit: Adjourned - Commonwealth of Redmont v. zLost [2023] SCR 14, the Court removed a case to the Supreme Court for the same reason as this case. The SCR also mentioned...
  14. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. ImzaKRD [2025] SCR 20

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honour, The Prosecution was not trying to imply that, because vvirtue_ was found guilty, the Defendant in this case must be too. The fact of the matter is, the District Court's verdict established that the act...
  15. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. ImzaKRD [2025] SCR 20

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CRIMINAL ACTION Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. ImzaKRD Defendant COMPLAINT The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows: PROSECUTING AUTHORITY REPORT vvirtue_ sent ImzaKRD, an Aventura Councillor...
  16. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honour, acting in my capacity as Defendant's counsel as appointed by the PDD, I ask that the Court reconsider this charge. Disobeying a lawful order of the court and engaging in conduct that obstructs or interferes...
  17. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96

    Your honour, may the Defense respond?
  18. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER Your honour, The PD Director was only trying to clarify his authority and decision to appoint me as PD to the court. I humbly ask for you to reconsider the Contempt charge.
  19. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECUSE This Presiding Officer has shown me, and the PD office as a whole, nothing but disrespect. They have cited non-existent rules for the dismissal of a PD. Now that all their attempts toward my dismissal have failed, they keep...
  20. S

    Lawsuit: In Session Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96

    RESPONSE TO MOTION TO RECONSIDER Defendant's counsel agrees to the motion to reconsider on the condition that only his in-game balance be used for transferring funds if a verdict enforcing said agreement is reached. However, if this response means that the Presiding Officer will once again...
Back
Top