Search results

I am no longer the presiding officer, but we can both agree that precedent is clear: My recusal shall stand.

Court is in recess pending a verdict.

Both motions are granted. This case is dismissed. No body shall be led in any contempt. Court is now adjourned. Thank you.

Objection Sustained. It is this court's belief that to call a sitting justice, judge, or magistrate to testify in a trial is improper. I allowed the communication from Smallfries because it was from their time prior to sitting on the bench. To ask a sitting judicial officer to testify and make...

I would normally allow for a response by the opposing counsel, but precedent is clear from Chief Justice xEndeavour. In UtCowboy21 v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2022] FCR 31, Chief Justice xEndeavour wrote: In line with this, I agree that there is no actual or perceived impartiality because of...

@Milkcrack , @gwiis, and @End shall be held in Contempt of Court. They shall each be fined $5,000. They are still ordered to comply with the Court ordered subpoena within 72 hours or face additional sanctions. Omegabiebel made themselves known to the court and the court missed it. I will not...

My bad for missing this, please join the Judicairy Discord to submit these documents. You have 48 hours to do so. cc: @aubunny @Franciscus please join as well so I can add you to the closed court session.

Here is the deal: 1. I do not find the argument that there was confusion based on frequent updates to a complaint to be reason enough to give grace on updating the answer to the complaint. The court allows complaints and answers to be modified during discovery; it is up to the counselors to keep...

72 hours starting now.

I had to drag out a piece of paper and write things down so I got the timeline correct. Here it is (again, my court, my timezome - MST). Sept. 10 8:23 AM - 72 hours were given for Plaintiff Closing Statements (deadline is Sept. 13, 8:23 AM) 8:39 AM - Plaintiff requests an additional 72 hours...

Since there is a contested fact about judicial prejudice, I shall allow the evidence. Objection overruled. The objection is overruled. Since Juniperfig served as a Federal Judge that expereince provides at least some value concerning the issues raise on Fact 10. That said, I will be limiting...

Sidebar created. For future PO reference it is Ticket #57.

I will rule on this when I am able to be in front of a computer again. You may within the next 24 hours. The Defense shall have 72 hours to submit their closing statement when I rule on the objection and all else. I’ll make sure to let you know in that post when the time starts.

You get 24, if you cannot post it have someone else in your firm take it on. I will remind counsel for the Defense that a speedy trial is guaranteed for citizens and that the counsel is not the one on trial but instead it is the Commonwealth.

So here is the timeline and my ruling on the request for a 3.6 Default Judgement. All dates and Times in Mountain Time Zone by the way. The motion to amend the complaint to add facts 26-40 was created on August 9th and approved on August 9th. The objection on the amendment was created on August...

It is correct that there is about 14 hours left.

Enough everyone. This is the final warning that any more outbursts or pings shall be held in contempt for every instance. @Franciscus, what speficially has not yet been addressed. You have 24 hours to let the court know.

Granted.

Granted. The case is dismissed with prejudice. The court is adjourned.

This case is on hold until we determine a presiding officer following the resignation of Ko. Please join the Judiciary and ping myself when you are there for closed court.