Search results

  1. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed NovaKerbal v. Town of Oakridge [2026] DCR 6

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT IMPROPER EVIDENCE As declared in [2025] FCR 49, evidence should be split up instead of collaged so they can be addressed individually throughout the case.
  2. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed NovaKerbal v. Town of Oakridge [2026] DCR 6

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT ANSWER TO COMPLAINT Novakerbal Plaintiff v. Town of Oakridge Defendant I. ANSWER TO COMPLAINT 1. DENY. The Town Council never voted on the message. 2. AFFIRM. Noting that charges on record at the time of posting do not mean that there will...
  3. ameslap

    Bill: Vote Legal Entity Act

    Abstain pending revote on amendments.
  4. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed NovaKerbal v. Town of Oakridge [2026] DCR 6

    Your honor, Sofia is on leave of absence and as such I am Acting Mayor here to represent the town. I will be accompanied by our town Attorney General @Franciscus.
  5. ameslap

    Act of Congress Digital Will Registry Act

    Nay - I do not believe that this should be a function of government, especially the Department of State, which has already seen its workload increase this term with Passports, and again soon, most likely with Gun Licenses. Wills should be a private matter determined by the player and their legal...
  6. ameslap

    Redundant Formatting Act

    Aye - this is hot.
  7. ameslap

    Bill: Rejected Judicial Standards Reform Act

    Nay - I agree.
  8. ameslap

    Act of Congress Give The Government A Break Act

    Nay - These dates are religious in nature and I believe that any such break should be done through staff authority or some type of executive discretion. Edit: hearing feedback on everything, I am changing my vote. I think I was short sighted in reading this at first glance.
  9. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96

    I have no intention of withdrawing that motion and request a ruling on it and DCR 96%27']Docket #41. Thank you.
  10. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Anthony_Org [2025] SCR 21

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Motion for Reconsideration Your honor, I was late posting the plea agreement that was finalized last night. I ask that the court give some leeway to the Defendant and not hold them in Contempt for my tardiness. Thank you.
  11. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Anthony_Org [2025] SCR 21

    Your honor, we have reached a plea deal: Anthony_org agrees to plea guilty or no contest and we are dropping the ban from public office sentencing.
  12. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. EatYourGreens_ [2025] DCR 101

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT Your honor, The Commonwealth agrees with the following (although not proper) motion proposed by the Defendant. We request summary judgement given all the facts, evidence, and arguments that have been given this...
  13. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. EatYourGreens_ [2025] DCR 101

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Objection - Breach of Procedure I think this goes without saying, but this is out of place... unless one of these posts happen to be their opening statement I guess. Thank you.
  14. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. EatYourGreens_ [2025] DCR 101

    IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Motion For Clarification Your honor, While unusual and this may not be a proper motion, it is an important one. The Commonwealth wishes to clarify if the Defendant was always representing themselves or if Vernicia was indeed the Defendant’s...
  15. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. EatYourGreens_ [2025] DCR 101

    Your Honor, Today, the Commonwealth will begin presenting a clear case that the Defendant, EatYourGreens_, committed obstruction of justice. This charge is not merely about an unfortunate encounter, but a willful interference with the lawful operations of justice. On November 13th, 2025...
  16. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Muggy21 v. Riverardd [2025] DCR 96

    Its a me, ameslap! I have taken over as the Plaintiff's Counsel. First, the Plaintiff removes the Motion for Recusal. That being said.... IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO RECONSIDER We request that you reconsider the settlement agreement proposed and in...
  17. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Adjourned Commonwealth of Redmont v. Anthony_Org [2025] SCR 21

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT CRIMINAL ACTION Commonwealth of Redmont Prosecution v. Anthony_org Defendant COMPLAINT The Prosecution alleges criminal actions committed by the Defendant as follows: I. PARTIES 1. Commonwealth of Redmont 2. Anthony_org II. FACTS All...
  18. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ameslap v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 126

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT REQUEST FOR NOLLE PROSEQUI Your honor, this pains me. I truly believe that Judicial Deliberations should be private, and having Congress FOI them is unacceptable. That being said... I do not have it in me to fight this fight along with all...
  19. ameslap

    Lawsuit: In Session Commonwealth of Redmont v. EatYourGreens_ [2025] DCR 101

    Sounds good. We are ready to proceed. If the Defendant is willing, we would also be open to an in-game trial.
  20. ameslap

    Lawsuit: Dismissed Ameslap v Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 126

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Objection to Witnesses Your honor, to keep things concise, I object to the following witnesses at this time per Rule 4.9 and Rule 6.3. You will see a general thread: The Commonwealth is looking for a legislative history fishing expedition...
Back
Top