Search results

@aubunny, please clarify what you wish to have. We will extend the discovery until 12:01 AM on September 16 (Mountain Standard Time, my court my timezone). That should give us enough time to finish all discovery. Will do the subpoenas in a moment. Sad day. Granted on the following: Channels...

Noted. As there are no questions, the Plaintiff has 72 hours to submit their closing statements. In the interest of time, once 72 hours are up or the Plaintiff's Closing statements are posted, the Defense shall have 72 hours starting from that moment.

Seeing as there have been no other questions, the witnesses now go to the Defense for questioning. As a reminder the process is a 24 ask period followed by a 24 hour answer period, and that cycle repeats until there are no further questions.

If I have missed anything, please let me know. With all the new motions it is easy to accidentally skip one.

Granted. The Commonwealth has 72 hours to produce the information requested. Go ahead.

Motion to Reconsider Denied. The SCR ruling does not leave a binding precedent on this case. The case cited, [2025] SCR 14, explores a potential mishandling of the Executive Standards Act and does not involve any constitutional arguments as this one does. The public shall retain the right to...

This is on hold until we get the WPR chats.

Go ahead and amend the complaint if you haven't already. Granted. The WPR is compelled to submit the messages as described by the subpoena within the next 72 hours.

Denied on the basis that the Objection Guide only defines Non-responsive remarks to witnesses and not to interrogatories. That being said, the Plaintiff is compelled to answer the second part of the question truthfully and to the best of their ability.

I shall deny these motions. I do not want to get this court sidetracked with every classification law and get away from the core question: Judicial FOI Requests. You can reach out to these individuals for information but I will not be compelling them to provide them. I will grant these motions...

Please explain the purpose to the court. This is broad-reaching and dates back years and I am inclined to deny anything that is rescinded or no longer relevant to the current Classified Materials Act.

Thank you for the reminder! So many cases hard to keep track of which ones are which. IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF REDMONT Verdict The Court accepts this settlement. The DHS is ordered to do the following: 1. Fine Mustafa Masody (ign: east_atlanta) $303,177.12 in damages and legal fees. 2. Unfine...

I will hold off for the time being as you have an interrogatory out to the Plaintiff on this very question. Additionally, I am reviewing everything. Granted. The Plaintiff is asked to turn over all communications by the end of discovery.

Don't know how this fell through the cracks but lets seeeeeeee: @asexualdinosaur please come hither for the expungement request of Multiman155 and let me know if you approve or not.

Granted. Once discovery begins please amend the evidence to the correct link. Granted. Also note that you may amend all you want during discovery as long as you notify the court. Motion denied. As Judge Nacho put it in [2024] - FCR 33: Now then, Discovery is now open and shall last for 5...

I shall allow it. The court is in recess pending the verdict. Thank you.

That’s fine.

You may.

Go ahead.

Granted. All Parties are to make themselves known in the Judiciary Discord for the closed court. Granted. This case is enjoined and shall not move forward until FCR 85 has concluded.