Search results

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION FOR NOLLE PROSEQUI The Plaintiff, in light of Your Honour’s ruling on the Defendant’s Rule 5.5 motion, and recognising that the matter cannot be successfully pursued further, respectfully moves that the Court discontinue the...

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENCE’S INTERROGATORIES 1. Have you ever entered the property C995 other than by warping to a /home? Yes. 2. Have you ever entered the property c108 other than by warping to a /home? Yes. 3. What does the Plaintiff understand “read before entry” to mean, as shown in...

RULE 4.6 EVIDENCE SUBMISSION Persuant to rule 4.6, the Plaintiff enters the following into evidence: P-111: The entirety of all Discord direct messages between Vernicia and jsrkiwi as of 21st November 2025.

PLAINTIFF'S WITNESS LIST The Plaintiff will not be adding any additional witnesses at this time. The witness list, therefore, remains as originally filed: jsrkiwi Vernicia Goldendude15 Roryyy_

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL Your Honour, the Plaintiff seeks to compel the following from the Defendant: Production of all records and evidence held by the DHS in respect of the five charges against jsrkiwi of Trespass, except for those already...

RESPONSE TO OBJECTION Your Honour, I respectfully submit that the defence’s objection mischaracterises the nature of the question. The form of the question (‘To the best of your recollection, recount the events of 9th November 2025’) is a proper, permissible open-ended question and not a breach...

CONSOLIDATED LIST OF WITNESS QUESTIONS In accordance with the Trial Protocol and Rules filed as #43 on 16th November 2025 by His Honour Judge Mug, the Plaintiff’s questions for witnesses are listed below. There are follow-up questions included. Please note, as Trentrick_Lamar is the Defendant...

I apologise Your Honour, I am unaware of the methods that staff use to search logs, and was not aware that such a search would be time-consuming for staff to carry out. Would Your Honour consider including a significantly more limited version of the request: 3. Any logs or other records...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Your Honour, and may it please the Court. This case centres on defamatory remarks made by the Defendant, Trentrick_Lamar, in response to a witness statement filed by the Plaintiff, jsrkiwi, in ticket dhs-25340 (exhibit P-001). In that...

Your Honour, there's been a slight misunderstanding; the list is accurate.

REQUEST TO AMEND MOTION TO COMPEL The Plaintiff respectfully seeks leave of this Honourable Court to amend the pending Motion to Compel Production of Staff Records to include the following additional request as paragraph 3 of the requested materials: 3. Any logs or other records showing when...

The Plaintiff does not object, Your Honour

The Plaintiff removes the 4th and 5th (both unnamed individuals) from the Plaintiff's witness list.

The Plaintiff provides the following items of discovery requested by the Defendant: REQUEST 1 Attached are the Minecraft logs listed in Request No. 1 (11–13 November). They are labelled as follows: P-101: 2025-11-11-1.log P-102: 2025-11-11-2.log P-103: 2025-11-12-1.log P-104: 2025-11-12-2.log...

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF STAFF RECORDS The Plaintiff respectfully moves this Honourable Court for an Order compelling the Staff Team to produce the records identified below, which are directly relevant to the issues in dispute and...

The Plaintiff does not object to Request No. 1 and will produce his logs as requested. Regarding request No. 2, the Plaintiff respectfully notes that certain home warps (specifically 'vernicia' and 'mzcd') were removed by the Plaintiff after the criminal charge and possibly after the...

Your Honour, I confirm that Franciscus’s statement is accurate and complete. For clarity, Your Honour, will the trial proceed under the amended rules and procedures issued by His Honour Judge Mug in #43, or will those be set aside?

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (RULE 5.5) THE DEFENDANT IGNORES THE CENTRAL ALLEGATION: FACT 18 1. The Motion pretends that the Complaint contains no plausible basis for reputational harm. That is flatly wrong. Fact 18 explicitly alleges that the slanderous statement was...

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (RULE 5.12) Plaintiff respectfully submits this Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the first and second claims for relief on the ground of alleged lack of standing, and further raises the issue of the timeliness of the...

Congratulations, your billboard application has been accepted! It will be pasted within 24-48 hours. Please open a Department of Commerce ticket on Discord if you have any queries or if your billboard content has not been pasted after 48 hours.