Search results

  1. M

    Lawsuit: In Session IgnitedTnT v. LeafLuxury LLC [2025] FCR 131

    @RiggoSoft , is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of IgnitedTNT v. Leafluxury LLC [2025] FCR 131 In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48...
  2. M

    Appeal: Accepted [2025] DCR 104 - Contempt of Court Charge - Appeal

    The Federal Court grants this appeal. You have 72 Hours to provide an Appellant Brief. Extensions permitted within the time frame.
  3. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    Respond to the above questions when able. @Rory When present, please answer questions presented to you.
  4. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    @jsrkiwi 1. When the log says “Teleporting to vernicia”, where exactly does that warp drop you? 2. When you use the ‘vernicia’ warp, what do you see immediately around you? 4. Prior to being charged by DHS, did you ever read the book by the entrance to plot c995? 5. When the log says...
  5. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    @Rory 1. Is there an official or unofficial DHS policy that treats a property-owner’s ‘ban-list’ book placed outside a property entrance as a valid instruction of trespass ban? 2. Is there a requirement for proof of service or confirmation that the accused saw the book or was informed of a ban...
  6. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    @Goldendude15 1. Please look at the discord ticket (exhibits D-T01, D-T02, D-T03, and D-T04) and the Plaintiff’s criminal record (exhibit P-001). What procedure did you follow when evaluating the complaint from Vernicia? 2. Did you verify that the Plaintiff had received any prior notice or ban...
  7. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    @Vernicia PLAINTIFF: Questions re instructions 1. When did you add the plaintiff’s name to the ‘ban list’ pages of the books outside the entrances to c108 and c995? 2. How did you notify the plaintiff that he was banned from c108 and c995? 3. If you did not notify the Plaintiff, why did you...
  8. M

    Lawsuit: Adjourned jsrkiwi v Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93

    @Vernicia @Goldendude15 @Rory are required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of jsrkiwi v. Department of Homeland Security [2025] DCR 93
  9. M

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    Objection #1 || NON-RESPONSIVE || OVERRULED - Witness xEndeavour answered an open-ended question by giving a narrative of his thought process. I don't see new arguments here from Attorney End. Objection #2 || NON-RESPONSIVE || SUSTAINED - @End (In a new post, please answer the questions...
  10. M

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    When able, please answer the questions when able
  11. M

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT Order - Disbarment of Attorney MysticPhunky On December 9th, 2025 at 2:52PM EST, MysticPhunky was summoned to the Federal Court to testify in YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth. At 4:48PM, he responded "i will not Testify in this case as i have...
  12. M

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    The questions are from Multiman155, YeetGlazer's attorney. I've reviewed the questions pending for you and see no issue with them in terms of attempting to harass you. Considering your followup post, you have no interest in following the orders of this Court. Therefore, I find you in Contempt...
  13. M

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    @Dogeington In Exhibit P-002, you stated "I can vouch, I saw it". What did you mean by this?
  14. M

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    @asexualdinosaur In exhibit P-014, where Dearev displays "GlobalCenter's bank acc[ount]" in an image within the auction thread for c343 - if these were DNB banknotes, what would be their values?
  15. M

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    @lawanoesepr To what extent have you communicated with Dearev regarding the eviction of the plots listed in Exhibit P-001?
  16. M

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    @MysticPhunky PLAINTIFF In exhibit P-018, you stated "Dearev has been doing evictions a bit early, Dearev asked me to auction a plot just for him to bid on it, which was one of the plots he evicted early". What did you mean by this? To what extent had you communicated with Dearev regarding...
  17. M

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    @YeetGlazer PLAINTIFF How did seeing the evictions in exhibit P-001 make you feel? How did seeing the eviction auction depicted in Exhibit P-014 make you feel? How did seeing the denial of the ticket in exhibit P-002 make you feel? DEFENSE On 30 Jul 25 you made an initial complaint to the...
  18. M

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    @End To what extent did you evaluate, to take from your phrasing in Exhibit P-002, that the eviction was "actioned at any time in the actioning member’s timezone" on the eviction date before declaring that "[t]he department has acted completely legally, within policy, and how it always...
  19. M

    Lawsuit: In Session YeetGlazer v. Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] FCR 76

    @dearev PLAINTIFF Taking a look at Exhibit P-028, what are the words between and including "Time and date from long, long ago" and "that’s a very good sign that the CMOS battery died"? Did you believe, as shown in the screenshots contained within Post No. 67, that your system time was...
Back
Top