All sustained.
@dearev
Please respond to Q1, Q2.1.3, and Q3.
Furthermore, under penalty of perjury and contempt, you shall answer Question 2 truthfully. On reading of P-002, a non-responsive answer is inappropriate.
The Court informs dearev that he has the right to remain silent and that...
Witnesses are excused. Thanks for participating!
@jsrkiwi @Franciscus
We will now proceed to Closing Arguments. Plaintiff has until 12/21/25 @ 5pm to present their statement and Defendant has until 12/24/25 @ 5pm to present their statement.
Absent any extensions, the Court will enter recess...
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Closing Statement -
Remarks on DCPolice
The Commonwealth prays this Court turn a blind eye to reality and put in its place a blind trust into a plugin demonstrated to, at least in this case, be faulty. Self-Defense is not a state of mind, it...
The Court admonishes @ToadKing. You will address me as Your Honour/Honor, or Judge Mug. If you call me "conflicted" or any other demeaning term, I will hold you in Contempt.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Order - Ameslap's Objections to Government Witnesses
The Plaintiff's objections are immensely untimely and thus should not be heard. That being said, the Court has a constitutional duty to exercise judicial power prudently, and not needlessly...
Granted. A civil court proceeding in a fact finding exercise need only find a balance of probabilities to ascertain the validity of a given fact. This Court will not use such information considering the disparity in standards of proof.
The Court acknowledges this suit and the pending staff investigation.
Having being pleasured by Lord Tech, the Court does stay these proceedings indefinitely.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Order - Motion to Reconsider P#4 - Sua Sponte Fact Dismissal
DENIED
The District Court's finding establishing the fact that the "act" of bribery occurred is evidence of the allegation, not a fact. Fact #10 was dismissed because if the "act"...
@Imza , is required to appear before the Federal Court in the case of Commonwealth of Redmont v. ImzaKRD [2025] FCR 133
In the interest of more efficient Courtroom proceedings, the Court will permit responses to motions without prior Court permission. The deadline for said motions shall be 48...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Order - Sua Sponte Dismissal of Fact 10 & 11
The Constitution, specifically R. Const 32 § (7) states that "[r]ights cannot be withheld on the basis of criminality, rights are inalienable." This is a criminal prosecution, this Court can't be...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Order to Show Cause - Statute of Limitations
The Court, on initial reading of the Complaint, is concerned that the Statute of Limitations has expired. As analyzed in Vernicia v. The Commonwealth of Redmont [2025] SCR 3, The statute of...
@RiggoSoft @BlueRiverOtter
This case thread isn't a place for conversation. If a party is misquoting you or not following your viewpoint, that goes into an argument or an objection.
Judge Mug’s Trial Protocol and Rules
Pursuant to Rule 1.2, these shall be the rules herein imposed for this trial. The timeframes listed for each section may be changed on application for an extension.
Extensions are permitted as long as requested during the period in question. Extension...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.