You have until 1/1/26 @ 5pm EST to present your questions to Witnesses on Direct Examination. (Plaintiff will not ask questions at this time, you'll be able to cross-examine them afterwards.)
(Judge Mug's Trial Rules)
@dearev
Please answer the following questions within 48 Hours. These questions should be Yes/No responses. You may use Y to signify Yes and N to signify "No" for simplicity.
Deadline 12/31/25 @ 9am EST. (End is upside down again, I believe. The Court reverts to its previous guideline)...
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF REDMONT
Order - Motion for Contempt
Plaintiff, at side-bar, requested this Court to hold xEndeavour in Contempt of Court for filing an impermissible objection to Plaintiff's cross-examination of Dearev.
Although the objection is not contained with...
QUESTION || OBJECTION || RULING
Q2 | INCOMPETENT | Sustained. The Court knows ElysiaCrynn is a Moderator, this is public knowledge. However, ElysiaCrynn may only personally appear in her Govt roles, if the CW wanted Staff input, the CW should've added Staff as a witness.
Q1 wasn't objected to.
The Court thanks parties for their filings.
@jsrkiwi @Franciscus
The Court takes judicial notice of the following and advises parties:
1) "Little Russia" is generally synonymous with C995 and other associated plots around x=4131, z=4117
2) The Court sought clarity on how an arrest on a...
Denied.
You'll have an opportunity during Closing Arguments to address all points that you otherwise would've been able to in your Opening Statement.
Furthermore, the burden of proof is on the Plaintiff.
Deadline for Statements remains on 12/26/25 @ 9pm EST.
Denied, the Commonwealth has not introduced "the spirit of Christmas" as evidence.
======================
(Above is a joke), deadline for Closing Statement is 12/26/25 @ 5pm. Court will enter recess on 12/28/25 @ 5pm.
FAMILY? HOLIDAYS? No such thing. $1m fine for lying. (Obvious reasons this is a joke, please dont appeal this lol)
Deadline extended to 12/26/25 @ 9pm EST. Neither party is prejudiced by this.
Denied. A lawsuit in of itself is not evidence of a risk of asset flight nor can this Court assume mal-intent from a party properly represented by Counsel.
The Federal Court removes this action to the Supreme Court, the requested sentencing exceeds the jurisdiction of the Federal Court.
The Caption is amended to Commonwealth v. Anthony_Org [2025] SCR 21
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.